Skip to content
Neighborhood · Glenarden, MD

Palmer Park Eviction Risk: Moderate

3 census tracts · pop 11,709 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 5.6/10 · range 5.4–5.8

Palmer Park spans 3 census tracts of Glenarden, MD, population 11,709. Scored across those inputs it reaches 5.6/10, placing it in the Moderate tier. Cost burden runs 56% against 27.9% citywide, putting Palmer Park 27.9% over its own city.

31% are severely burdened, paying half their income or more in rent. That cohort has no absorption capacity for an unexpected bill, and it is where non-payment filings originate. The clearest offset is supply constraint, at 1.9/10. 19.6% of adults report being unable to pay a utility bill, against a 9.2% national figure. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

Food insecurity affects 35.0% of adults, 17.2 points above the national rate. Running hot is tenant-organizing strength at 7.9/10.

The poverty rate is 24%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than the filing statistics suggest. Court records carry 7,051 eviction filings across its 2 observed tracts.

Filing activity peaked in 2011 at 135.6% of renter households. Recent filings have not receded much: 100.4% in 2016 against a 135.6% peak.

The closest comparables inside the same city are Ardwick Park and Ardmore. Social vulnerability runs high at 9.1/10, concentrating the disaster- and displacement-exposure this model treats as a lagging risk input.

Its 3 tracts score within 0.4 points of one another, so the area figure travels well to individual addresses. Average gross rent runs $1,598, close to the Glenarden average.

Annual rent works out to 31% of average household income of $62,347. 58% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

The area figure travels well to individual addresses here, though the per-tract table below still carries the detail. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.

Risk score
5.6
Moderate
3 tracts · population-weighted
Palmer Park vs Glenarden How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
55.8% +100%
Glenarden: 27.9%
Average gross rent
$1,598 -1%
Glenarden: $1,620
Average HH income
$62,347 -36%
Glenarden: $96,875
Poverty rate
24.0% +381%
Glenarden: 5.0%
Renter share
58.0% +166%
Glenarden: 21.8%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Palmer Park and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 3 tracts span score 5.4–5.8

Why Palmer Park scores 5.6

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 5.7–5.7 across tracts
5.7
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 9.0–9.0 across tracts
9.0
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 9.1–9.1 across tracts
9.1
Rent control risk
56% of income on rent · Range 4.4–8.3 across tracts
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 4.9–5.8 across tracts
5.4
Tenant organizing strength
58% renter households · Range 4.5–9.5 across tracts
7.9
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 3.8–8.0 across tracts
6.2
Economic stress
24.0% below poverty line · Range 5.8–6.4 across tracts
6.0
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 1.7–2.5 across tracts
1.9
Risk score comparison

Palmer Park vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Palmer Park score vs. parent city, state, U.S.5.6Palmer ParkNeighborhood4.0Parent cityhost city5.5Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Variance across tracts

How uniformly does eviction risk play out in Palmer Park?

Left: distribution of constituent tract scores. Right: every tract as a heat square. Click any square to drill in.

Score distribution
0246810
Spread of 0.4 points from 5.4 to 5.8. Tracts are relatively uniform, so conditions feel similar throughout the neighborhood.
Tracts as heat grid
Each square = one census tract. Color tracks the same green→red ramp as the chloropleth map above.
Census tracts

3 tracts in Palmer Park

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
24033803525 5.8 2,413 57% $1,730
24033803403 5.7 5,618 55% $1,568
24033803508 5.4 3,678 56% $1,556
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 90

Pop-weighted across 3 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 85%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 89%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 96%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 72%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history in Palmer Park

Aggregated across 2 validated constituent tracts. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households, pop-weighted.

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 7,051Total filings (sum)
  • 115.25%Avg annual filing rate
  • 135.6%Peak year (2011)
  • 103.65%Latest filed (2016)
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Palmer Park

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Palmer Park

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Palmer Park?

Palmer Park scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier) across 3 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Palmer Park compare to Glenarden overall?

Palmer Park scores 1.6 points higher than Glenarden overall (4/10). Renters spend 56% of income on rent vs 28% citywide. Average rent: $1,598 vs $1,620.
Q3

What is the average rent in Palmer Park?

Average gross rent in Palmer Park is $1,598/month (pop-weighted across 3 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Palmer Park residents are renters?

58% of Palmer Park households are renter-occupied (vs 22% in Glenarden). The neighborhood has 11,709 residents.
Q5

Is Palmer Park a high social-vulnerability area?

Palmer Park sits in the 90th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (highly vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

Which tracts in Palmer Park have the highest eviction risk?

The highest-risk constituent tract in Palmer Park is census tract 24033803525 (score 5.8/10). Across the 3 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 5.4 to 5.8, a spread of 0.4 points.
Q7

How safe is Palmer Park for landlords?

Palmer Park carries a moderate-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (5.6/10). Pop-weighted across 3 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Glenarden as a whole (4/10), this neighborhood is higher-risk.
Q8

What is the demographic breakdown of Palmer Park?

Palmer Park has 11,478 residents. Top groups: Black (non-Hispanic) (71.3%), Hispanic / Latino (16.5%), Other / Multiracial (5.5%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Palmer Park

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Glenarden

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Palmer Park.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further