Cedarwood Eviction Risk: Elevated , Waltham
Tract 25017368400 · Middlesex County, MA · pop 7,836 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Census tract 25017368400 covers part of the Cedarwood area of Waltham, MA, and scores 6/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 7,836. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.2/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Waltham and the region
Centroid at 42.3657, -71.2564 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cedarwood scores 6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Cedarwood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 18
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 19%Socioeconomic
- 2%Household composition
- 52%Racial/ethnic minority
- 66%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 5%Grade A
- 2%Grade B
- 7%Grade C
- 2%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 54Total filings over 4 yrs
- 0.99%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.2%Peak (2014)
- 14Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 0Total filings 2020-21
- 0.0Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.8%Housing insecurity
- 4.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.1%Food insecurity
- 8.4%SNAP enrollment
- 7.3%Transit barriers
- 3.6%No health insurance
- 17.9%Frequent mental distress
- 21.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Cedarwood
Running cool, economic stress reads 1.3/10. Well under the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 2.5/10.
Severe burden reaches 10%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Food insecurity runs 9.1% against 17.8% nationally.
The filing record is not thin: 54 evictions over 4 years of observation. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.6% against 11.3% nationally.
At $2,500 a month, rents run 10% over what the rest of Waltham commands. The worst year on record was 2014, when 1.2% of renter households were served.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Waltham. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 1.0% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #18,163 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Social vulnerability reads 2.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 25017368400
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25017368400?
What is the average rent in tract 25017368400?
What is the poverty rate in tract 25017368400?
How socially vulnerable is tract 25017368400?
Is tract 25017368400 considered part of Cedarwood?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25017368400?
What share of households in tract 25017368400 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 25017368400 compare to Waltham overall?
Was tract 25017368400 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Waltham
Top eight tracts in Waltham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.