Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #18,163 of 84,120 nationally

Cedarwood Eviction Risk: Elevated , Waltham

Tract 25017368400 · Middlesex County, MA · pop 7,836 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Census tract 25017368400 covers part of the Cedarwood area of Waltham, MA, and scores 6/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 7,836. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.2/10.

Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 28% Owners 51%
Tract context
Occupied units2,412
Renter share49.5%
SVI overall0.18
Poverty rate5.2%
Median income$123,795

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Cedarwood
Moderate
Within parent city
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#8 of 13 tracts In Waltham
Moderate
Within county
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#171 of 357 tracts In Middlesex County
Moderate
Within state
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#811 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Waltham and the region

Centroid at 42.3657, -71.2564 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cedarwood scores 6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Waltham
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
5.2% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$2,500 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Waltham
5.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Waltham
9.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Waltham
4.9

How Cedarwood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cedarwood risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.0This tracttract 3684006.5Walthamparent city6.3Countyavg tract in county6.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 18

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 54Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 0.99%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.2%Peak (2014)
  • 14Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2012 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 25017368400

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 0Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2023-11-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cedarwood

Running cool, economic stress reads 1.3/10. Well under the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 2.5/10.

Severe burden reaches 10%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Food insecurity runs 9.1% against 17.8% nationally.

The filing record is not thin: 54 evictions over 4 years of observation. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.6% against 11.3% nationally.

At $2,500 a month, rents run 10% over what the rest of Waltham commands. The worst year on record was 2014, when 1.2% of renter households were served.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Waltham. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 1.0% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #18,163 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Social vulnerability reads 2.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 25017368400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25017368400?

Census tract 25017368400 in the Cedarwood neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 25017368400?

Median gross rent is $2,500/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 25017368400?

5.2% of residents in tract 25017368400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,836.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 25017368400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 18th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 19th, household 2th, minority 52th, housing 66th.
Q5

Is tract 25017368400 considered part of Cedarwood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25017368400 fall within Cedarwood (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25017368400?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 54 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 25017368400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.99% of renter households, peaking at 1.2% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 25017368400 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 25017368400 compare to Waltham overall?

Tract 25017368400 scores 6/10, lower than the parent city of Waltham at 6.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Waltham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 25017368400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 2% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Waltham

Top eight tracts in Waltham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related