Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,657 of 84,120 nationally

Mount Ida Eviction Risk: High , Boston

Tract 25025091700 · Suffolk County, MA · pop 3,292 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

With a score of 9.5/10, tract 25025091700 in the Mount Ida area of Boston, MA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,292. The severe-burden share is 44%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
9.5
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 37% Stable renters 21% Owners 42%
Tract context
Occupied units1,031
Renter share58.1%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate27.3%
Median income$72,780

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Mount Ida
Very High
Within parent city
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#51 of 206 tracts In Boston
High
Within county
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 234 tracts In Suffolk County
Very High
Within state
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Boston and the region

Centroid at 42.3036, -71.0659 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mount Ida scores 9.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Boston
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.2
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
27.3% poverty · this tract
6.8
Supply constraint
$2,131 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Boston
8.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Boston
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Boston
8.0

How Mount Ida compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mount Ida risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.5This tracttract 0917008.1Bostonparent city7.9Countyavg tract in county6.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 95

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 204Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 5.69%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.7%Peak (2015)
  • 38Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2012 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 25025091700
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 70Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.47×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2023-11-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Mount Ida. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mount Ida

64% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Suffolk County average of 47.0%. SNAP participation runs 36.4% against 15.2% nationally. What pushes it up most is local political climate at 8.5/10.

Annualized rent equals 35% of average household income of $72,780, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.5/10.

Against the Suffolk County average of 7.9, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.6 points. The poverty rate is 27%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Food insecurity runs 31.5% against 17.8% nationally. Sitting well above the midpoint, regional political climate reads 8.2/10.

The filing record is not thin: 204 evictions over 5 years of observation. The worst year on record was 2015, when 6.7% of renter households were served.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 5.7% of renter households face a filing.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 25025091700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25025091700?

Census tract 25025091700 in the Mount Ida neighborhood scores 9.5/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 25025091700?

Median gross rent is $2,131/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 25025091700?

27.3% of residents in tract 25025091700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,292.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 25025091700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 98th, minority 96th, housing 83th.
Q5

Is tract 25025091700 considered part of Mount Ida?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25025091700 fall within Mount Ida (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25025091700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 204 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 25025091700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.69% of renter households, peaking at 6.7% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 25025091700 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.47× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Boston eviction risk, MA), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 25025091700 struggle to pay rent?

About 27.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 18.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 25025091700 compare to Boston overall?

Tract 25025091700 scores 9.5/10, higher than the parent city of Boston at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Boston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 25025091700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Boston

Top eight tracts in Boston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related