Tract 25025092000 ·
Suffolk County, MA · pop 5,751 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
In Mount Ida in Boston, census tract 25025092000 scores 6.9/10 for eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #5,750 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 50% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,608 a month against an average household income of $59,757 a year, roughly 32% of income at the averages. Renters make up 63% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32%Stable renters 31%Owners 37%
Tract context
Occupied units1,898
Renter share63.5%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate18.8%
Median income$59,757
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Mount Ida
Very Low
Within parent city
70th percentile
#63 of 206 tracts In Boston
Elevated
Within county
74th percentile
#61 of 234 tracts In Suffolk County
Elevated
Within state
93th percentile
#110 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Boston and the region
Centroid at 42.2997, -71.0676 · click any tract to drill in
Why Mount Ida scores 6.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Boston
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.2
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
18.8% poverty · this tract
4.7
Supply constraint
$1,608 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Boston
8.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Boston
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Boston
8.0
How Mount Ida compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 94
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
87%Socioeconomic
88%Household composition
92%Racial/ethnic minority
86%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
99%Grade C
1%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
312Total filings over 5 yrs
5.26%Avg annual filing rate
6.7%Peak (2013)
66Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2012 to 2016
Filings climbed 25% over the past 5 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
128Total filings 2020-21
2.7Avg monthly (observed)
5.4Pre-pandemic baseline
0.51×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2023-11-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
29.6%Housing insecurity
21.5%Utility-shutoff threat
36.9%Food insecurity
44.6%SNAP enrollment
20.6%Transit barriers
10.7%No health insurance
21.1%Frequent mental distress
37.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Mount Ida
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Boston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Suffolk County average of 6.7 and above the Massachusetts statewide average of 5.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 94th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
Part of this tract, about 1% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was C ("Declining"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 25025092000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25025092000?
Census tract 25025092000 in the Mount Ida neighborhood scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 25025092000?
Median gross rent is $1,608/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 25025092000?
18.8% of residents in tract 25025092000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,751.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 25025092000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 88th, minority 92th, housing 86th.
Q5
Is tract 25025092000 considered part of Mount Ida?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25025092000 fall within Mount Ida (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25025092000?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 312 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 25025092000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.26% of renter households, peaking at 6.7% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 25025092000 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.51× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Boston eviction risk, MA), 2020-2021.
Q8
What share of households in tract 25025092000 struggle to pay rent?
About 29.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 21.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9
How does tract 25025092000 compare to Boston overall?
Tract 25025092000 scores 6.4/10, lower than the parent city of Boston at 7.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Boston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10
Was tract 25025092000 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Boston
Top eight tracts in Boston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.