Skip to content
Forest Hills, Michigan eviction risk overview
Ranked #858 of 1,865 nationally

Forest Hills, MI Eviction Risk: MODERATE

Kent County · Population 28,695

In 2026
Risk score
5.3
MODERATE

65th percentile, Michigan.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.4 Average2.4 Now5.3
10 5 1976 · score 1.5 1977 · score 1.5 1978 · score 1.5 1979 · score 1.5 1980 · score 1.7 1981 · score 1.7 1982 · score 1.7 1983 · score 1.6 1984 · score 1.4 1985 · score 1.4 1986 · score 1.4 1987 · score 1.4 1988 · score 1.6 1989 · score 1.6 1990 · score 1.7 1991 · score 1.7 1992 · score 2.2 1993 · score 2.2 1994 · score 2.2 1995 · score 2.2 1996 · score 2.5 1997 · score 2.5 1998 · score 2.5 1999 · score 2.5 2000 · score 1.8 2001 · score 1.8 2002 · score 1.9 2003 · score 1.9 2004 · score 1.9 2005 · score 2.0 2006 · score 2.0 2007 · score 2.1 2008 · score 2.7 2009 · score 2.9 2010 · score 2.9 2011 · score 2.9 2012 · score 2.6 2013 · score 2.6 2014 · score 2.7 2015 · score 2.7 2016 · score 2.7 2017 · score 2.8 2018 · score 2.9 2019 · score 3.0 2020 · score 3.6 2021 · score 3.6 2022 · score 3.6 2023 · score 3.6 2024 · score 3.5 2025 · score 5.1 2026 · score 5.3

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 5.8 Regional 5.8 State 3.3 Economic 2.9 Supply 5.8 Rent Control 3.4 Eviction 3.0 Tenant 2.2 Housing 2.8 5.3 MODERATE
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +5.4% (2024)
    5.8
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    5.8
  3. State political climate
    Michigan legislature & governorship
    3.3
  4. Economic stress
    2.6% poverty · 1.5% unemp.
    2.9
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,958 average · 6.0% renters
    5.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    22.4% of income on rent
    3.4
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    55 days filing → judgment
    3.0
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    6.0% renters
    2.2
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    2.8
Geographic context

Risk heat across Forest Hills and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Forest Hills compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Kent County
Very Low
#17 of 20 cities
Rank in county, 16th percentileBottomTop
#17 of 20 cities in Kent County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Michigan
Elevated
#271 of 743 cities
Rank in state, 64th percentileBottomTop
#271 of 743 cities in Michigan for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Forest Hills risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Forest Hills: 5.35.3Forest HillsThis cityCounty: 5.65.6Countyavg in countyState: 5.85.8Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 5.3
    / 10 · MODERATE
    The verdict

    A Moderate-tier market.

    Composite 5.3/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+3.8 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 55d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,958/mo. A contested eviction takes 55 days and costs $2,838-$6,214 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 6.0%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 28,695 residents, 6.0% rent. 22% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 2.6% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 5.8
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 5.8 and 5.8 (Dem margin +5.4% (2024)). State climate at 3.3, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 3.3
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 3.3/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 3, housing court bias 2.8, rent-control risk 3.4. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.0 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 2.9
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 2.9. Supply constraint: 5.8. The numbers behind those: 2.6% poverty, 1.5% unemployment, 22% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Forest Hills sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Grand Rapids, MI · 54d · ~$4.7k all-in ($88/day) · score 5.3 Grand Rapids Lansing, MI · 64d · ~$4.5k all-in ($70/day) · score 5.9 Lansing Wyoming, MI · 63d · ~$4.6k all-in ($72/day) · score 5.9 Wyoming Kalamazoo, MI · 55d · ~$4.8k all-in ($88/day) · score 6.4 Kalamazoo Kentwood, MI · 54d · ~$4.7k all-in ($87/day) · score 6 Kentwood Battle Creek, MI · 60d · ~$4.4k all-in ($73/day) · score 6 Battle Creek Detroit, MI · 62d · ~$4.9k all-in ($78/day) · score 6.6 Detroit Warren, MI · 65d · ~$4.5k all-in ($68/day) · score 4.8 Warren Sterling Heights, MI · 56d · ~$4.7k all-in ($83/day) · score 4.6 Sterling Heights Ann Arbor, MI · 55d · ~$4.3k all-in ($77/day) · score 4.6 Ann Arbor Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Forest Hills
Forest Hills · 55d · ~$4.5k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.3 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Forest Hills, MI

Landlording in Forest Hills, Michigan, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 5.3/10 (MODERATE tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Forest Hills is a city of 28,695 residents where 6.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 22.4% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,958/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Forest Hills eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 3/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Forest Hills closes 55 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Forest Hills's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 2.8/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Forest Hills runs $2,838 to $6,214 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 55 days of typical timeline and $1,958/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.2/10 in Forest Hills, and the city has limited rent control exposure (3.4/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Michigan, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Forest Hills: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a MODERATE tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Michigan's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $6,214 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Forest Hills

Trap · 6.1 POINTS
Politically, Kent County voted Democratic by 6.1 points in 2020, a baseline that correlates with tenant-protective legislative pressure. Combined with 22.4% rent-to-income ratio, expect baseline enforcement of MCL 600.5701.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Forest Hills without a reason?

No, not exactly. While Michigan doesn't have statewide "just-cause" eviction requirements, you still need a valid legal reason. This typically means non-payment of rent, a lease violation, or the end of a fixed-term lease. You can't just decide you don't like a tenant and evict them. For a month-to-month tenancy, you can issue a 30-day no-cause termination notice, but that's different from evicting a tenant mid-lease without cause.
Q2

How long does it take to get a court date for an eviction in Kent County?

After you file your Summons and Complaint, the court typically schedules a hearing within 10-20 days, depending on their caseload. This is part of the 55-day average timeline. Don't expect an immediate hearing.
Q3

Can I change the locks if my tenant stops paying rent?

Absolutely not. This is an illegal "self-help" eviction in Michigan and can lead to serious penalties, including owing the tenant damages. You must go through the legal eviction process to regain possession of your property. Stick to the Michigan eviction process step-by-step.
Q4

What if my tenant claims they can't pay due to financial hardship?

While you might sympathize, financial hardship is generally not a legal defense against non-payment of rent in an eviction case. You are within your rights to proceed with the eviction. You can choose to work with them, perhaps a payment plan, but you are not legally obligated to do so.
Q5

Are there rent control laws in Forest Hills?

No. Michigan has a statewide preemption against rent control. This means no city or county in Michigan, including Forest Hills or Kent County, can enact rent control ordinances. You have the flexibility to set market rates. More on this at Michigan rent control rules.
Q6

Do I need an attorney for an eviction in Forest Hills?

While you can represent yourself, it's highly recommended to hire an attorney, especially if it's your first eviction or if the tenant is disputing the case. Landlord-tenant law is specific, and mistakes in procedure or paperwork can cause significant delays or even lead to your case being dismissed. Given the typical costs, an attorney can often save you money in the long run by ensuring the process is handled efficiently.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 5.3/10 places Forest Hills in the 65th percentile of Michigan cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.