Skip to content
Warren, Michigan eviction risk overview
Ranked #922 of 1,865 nationally

Warren, MI Eviction Risk: LOW

Macomb County · Population 137,928

In 2026
Risk score
3.5
LOW

98th percentile, Michigan.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.9 Average2.9 Now3.5
4.7 1.9 1976 · score 2.3 1977 · score 2.2 1978 · score 2.2 1979 · score 2.2 1980 · score 2.4 1981 · score 2.4 1982 · score 2.4 1983 · score 2.4 1984 · score 2.3 1985 · score 2.3 1986 · score 2.1 1987 · score 2.1 1988 · score 1.9 1989 · score 1.9 1990 · score 2.0 1991 · score 2.1 1992 · score 2.7 1993 · score 2.6 1994 · score 2.6 1995 · score 2.5 1996 · score 2.8 1997 · score 2.8 1998 · score 2.8 1999 · score 2.8 2000 · score 2.8 2001 · score 2.8 2002 · score 2.8 2003 · score 2.9 2004 · score 2.8 2005 · score 2.9 2006 · score 2.9 2007 · score 3.0 2008 · score 3.6 2009 · score 3.8 2010 · score 3.8 2011 · score 3.8 2012 · score 3.7 2013 · score 3.7 2014 · score 3.5 2015 · score 3.4 2016 · score 3.4 2017 · score 3.3 2018 · score 3.3 2019 · score 3.2 2020 · score 4.6 2021 · score 4.7 2022 · score 3.7 2023 · score 3.4 2024 · score 3.6 2025 · score 3.5 2026 · score 3.5

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.5 Regional 4.5 State 4.5 Economic 5.5 Supply 4.0 Rent Control 1.5 Eviction 3.5 Tenant 3.0 Housing 3.5 3.5 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +13.7% (2024)
    4.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.5
  3. State political climate
    Michigan legislature & governorship
    4.5
  4. Economic stress
    12.8% poverty · 7.4% unemp.
    5.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,225 average · 28.9% renters
    4.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    32.9% of income on rent
    1.5
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    65 days filing → judgment
    3.5
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    28.9% renters
    3.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.5
Geographic context

Risk heat across Warren and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Warren compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Macomb County
Very High
#2 of 14 cities
Rank in county, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 14 cities in Macomb County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Michigan
Very High
#45 of 743 cities
Rank in state, 94th percentileLowHigh
#45 of 743 cities in Michigan for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Warren risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Warren: 3.53.5WarrenThis cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg in countyState: 3.33.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3.5
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3.5/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+1.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 65d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,225/mo. A contested eviction takes 65 days and costs $2,204–$6,699 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 28.9%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 137,928 residents, 28.9% rent. 33% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 12.8% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.5 and 4.5 (GOP margin +13.7% (2024)). State climate at 4.5, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 4.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 4.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 3.5, housing court bias 3.5, rent-control risk 1.5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-1.5 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.5. Supply constraint: 4. The numbers behind those: 12.8% poverty, 7.4% unemployment, 33% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Warren sits in the slow but cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Detroit, MI · 62d · ~$4.9k all-in ($78/day) · score 4.4 Detroit Sterling Heights, MI · 56d · ~$4.7k all-in ($83/day) · score 3.2 Sterling Heights Ann Arbor, MI · 55d · ~$4.3k all-in ($77/day) · score 3.6 Ann Arbor Dearborn, MI · 56d · ~$4.6k all-in ($81/day) · score 3.4 Dearborn Livonia, MI · 62d · ~$5.0k all-in ($80/day) · score 3.1 Livonia Troy, MI · 59d · ~$4.3k all-in ($73/day) · score 2.9 Troy Westland, MI · 57d · ~$4.7k all-in ($82/day) · score 3.1 Westland Farmington Hills, MI · 54d · ~$5.1k all-in ($94/day) · score 3 Farmington Hills Flint, MI · 59d · ~$4.8k all-in ($81/day) · score 4.2 Flint Rochester Hills, MI · 58d · ~$4.4k all-in ($77/day) · score 2.9 Rochester Hills Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Warren
Warren · 65d · ~$4.5k all-in ($68/day) · score 3.5 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Warren, MI

Landlording in Warren, Michigan, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.5/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Warren is a city of 137,928 residents where 28.9% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 32.9% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,225/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Warren eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 3.5/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Warren closes 65 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Warren's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Warren runs $2,204 to $6,699 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 65 days of typical timeline and $1,225/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 3/10 in Warren, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Michigan, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Warren: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Michigan's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $6,699 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Warren

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Warren to neighboring cities in Macomb County via the grid below. The 6.5/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under MCL 600.5701. Macomb County 2020 presidential margin: R+8.1. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for Michigan statutory detail.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What are the biggest mistakes Warren landlords make during an eviction?

The most common mistakes are delaying the initial notice, accepting partial rent payments after issuing a notice without proper legal understanding, and failing to serve notices correctly. Also, many landlords neglect proper documentation, which is crucial evidence in court. Don't try to change locks or shut off utilities; that's illegal self-help eviction.

Q2

Can I evict a tenant in Warren without a lawyer?

Yes, you can. Michigan's eviction process is designed to be accessible. However, if the tenant hires an attorney, or if the case becomes complicated (e.g., counterclaims, habitability issues), having your own legal counsel is strongly recommended to protect your interests and avoid costly errors.

Q3

How long do I have to return a security deposit in Warren?

You have 30 days from when the tenant moves out to return the security deposit or provide an itemized list of damages and deductions. Failing to do so can result in significant penalties, including the potential for double damages.

Q4

Are there any rent control laws in Warren, MI?

No, there are no rent control laws in Warren or anywhere else in Michigan. Michigan has a state preemption law that prohibits local governments from enacting rent control. This contributes to Warren's low rent-control-risk sub-score of 1.5/10. For more on this, see our Michigan rent control rules.

Q5

What if my tenant claims issues with the property to avoid eviction?

This is a common tactic. Document all communication and maintenance requests. If the tenant raises legitimate repair issues, address them promptly and document the repairs. If they raise them only after an eviction notice, it may be a defense tactic. A judge will evaluate the timing and severity of the claims. This is a good time to consult an attorney.

Q6

Does Warren have source-of-income protection for tenants?

No, there is no statewide source-of-income protection in Michigan, and Warren does not have its own local ordinance for this. This means landlords are generally not prohibited from considering a tenant's source of income (e.g., Section 8 vouchers) when making rental decisions. However, always be mindful of fair housing laws. Learn more at Michigan tenant protections.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3.5/10 places Warren in the 98th percentile of Michigan cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.