Census Tract · Ranked #50,654 of 84,120 nationally
Walker Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 26081011602 ·
Kent County, MI · pop 3,288
Tract 26081011602 sits in Walker eviction risk, MI, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.9/10. It is home to 3,288 residents. 24% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Kent County average of 43.7%.
Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 9%Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,308
Renter share11.5%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate7.9%
Median income$79,514
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
20th percentile
#5 of 6 tracts In Walker
Low
Within county
44th percentile
#82 of 145 tracts In Kent County
Moderate
Within state
51th percentile
#1,468 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Moderate
National
40th percentile
#50,654 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Walker and the region
Centroid at 42.9931, -85.7626 · click any tract to drill in
Why Walker scores 3.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Walker
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
7.9% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Walker
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Walker
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Walker
4.4
How Walker compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 26
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
8.5%Housing insecurity
5.9%Utility-shutoff threat
10.5%Food insecurity
8.9%SNAP enrollment
6.0%Transit barriers
5.9%No health insurance
16.0%Frequent mental distress
28.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Walker
The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.2/10. Running cool, economic stress reads 2/10.
Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.5/10. The severe-burden share is 11%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Food insecurity runs 10.5% against 17.8% nationally. On the national scale it lands near the 40th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 12% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.3/10. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 26081011602
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26081011602?
Census tract 26081011602 in Walker scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 26081011602?
7.9% of residents in tract 26081011602 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,288.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 26081011602?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 62th, minority 21th, housing 57th.
Q4
What share of households in tract 26081011602 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q5
How does tract 26081011602 compare to Walker overall?
Tract 26081011602 scores 3.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Walker at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Walker eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Walker
Top eight tracts in Walker ranked by composite eviction-risk score.