Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #61,757 of 84,120 nationally

Walker Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 26081011701 · Kent County, MI · pop 5,727

Walker is where census tract 26081011701 sits, home to 5,727 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is $1/10. On the national scale it ranks #21,196 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 50% of renter households, a severe level, and 31% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,235 a month while the average household earns $67,253 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 17% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 9% Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units2,224
Renter share17.3%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate8.7%
Median income$67,253

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 6 tracts In Walker
Very High
Within county
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#88 of 145 tracts In Kent County
Low
Within state
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#2,001 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Low
National
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#61,757 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Walker and the region

Centroid at 42.9767, -85.7680 · click any tract to drill in

Why Walker scores 2.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Walker
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
8.7% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,235 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Walker
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Walker
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Walker
4.4

How Walker compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Walker risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.82.8This tracttract 011701Walker: 2.92.9Walkerparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 24

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Walker

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Walker eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Kent County average of 5.7 and in line with the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 24th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 26081011701

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26081011701?

Census tract 26081011701 in Walker scores 2.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26081011701?

Median gross rent is $1,235/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26081011701?

8.7% of residents in tract 26081011701 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,727.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26081011701?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 15th, household 11th, minority 20th, housing 74th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 26081011701 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 26081011701 compare to Walker overall?

Tract 26081011701 scores 2.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Walker at 2.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Walker eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Walker

Top eight tracts in Walker ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related