Census Tract · Ranked #39,308 of 84,120 nationally

Roseville Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 26099255900 · Macomb County, MI · pop 1,906

Census tract 26099255900 covers part of Roseville, MI, and scores 4.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,906. 36% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score

4.6

Moderate

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 8% Owners 84%

Tract context

Occupied units838

Renter share15.3%

SVI overall0.60

Poverty rate10.0%

Median income$58,937

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Roseville and the region

Centroid at 42.4986, -82.9418 · click any tract to drill in

Why Roseville scores 4.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Roseville

5.1

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

4.6

State political climate

Michigan legislature & governorship

3.3

Economic stress

10.0% poverty · this tract

2.5

Supply constraint

$1,219 rent vs county FMR

3.8

Rent control risk

Inherited from Roseville

6.8

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

3.0

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Roseville

7.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Roseville

6.3

How Roseville compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 60

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

65%Socioeconomic
18%Household composition
47%Racial/ethnic minority
77%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
100%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

15.0%Housing insecurity
10.9%Utility-shutoff threat
19.4%Food insecurity
18.3%SNAP enrollment
10.3%Transit barriers
8.1%No health insurance
20.5%Frequent mental distress
34.9%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Roseville

The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.7/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.5/10. Cost burden runs about half here against 44.2% across Macomb County.

On the softer side, economic stress reads 2.5/10. It sits 0.7 points above the Macomb County average of 3.9. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Detroit. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Nationally it ranks #39,308 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 15% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

Social vulnerability reads 6.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. Average gross rent is $1,219, close to the Roseville average.

Annual rent works out to 25% of average household income of $58,937.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 26099255900

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26099255900?

Census tract 26099255900 in Roseville scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 26099255900?

Median gross rent is $1,219/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 26099255900?

10.0% of residents in tract 26099255900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,906.

How socially vulnerable is tract 26099255900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 60th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 65th, household 18th, minority 47th, housing 77th.

What share of households in tract 26099255900 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 26099255900 compare to Roseville overall?

Tract 26099255900 scores 4.6/10, higher than the parent city of Roseville at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Roseville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 26099255900 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Roseville

Top eight tracts in Roseville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.