Tract 26099242001 Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 26099242001 · Macomb County, MI · pop 1,340
For landlords sizing up Macomb, census tract 26099242001 carries an elevated eviction-risk score of $1/10. That is riskier than roughly 75% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
67% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 36% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,209 monthly, set against $73,125 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 44% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Macomb County and the region
Centroid at 42.6100, -82.9609 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 26099242001 scores 3.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Tract 26099242001 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 51
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 47%Socioeconomic
- 81%Household composition
- 57%Racial/ethnic minority
- 28%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.7%Housing insecurity
- 7.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.2%Food insecurity
- 12.2%SNAP enrollment
- 7.0%Transit barriers
- 6.1%No health insurance
- 15.3%Frequent mental distress
- 37.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Tract 26099242001
The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are set by Michigan eviction laws law, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Macomb County average of 5.5 and in line with the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 51st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.