Novi Eviction Risk: Lower

The voucher gap is 33.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10. Severe burden reaches 18%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Running hot, supply constraint reads 8.3/10. Against Oakland County at 39.8%, 31% of renters here are cost-burdened.

SNAP participation runs 6.2% against 15.2% nationally. Adults with no health insurance runs 4.1% against 11.3% nationally.

That is riskier than roughly 38% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 16% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.8/10. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.