Tract 26161413401 Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 26161413401 · Washtenaw County, MI · pop 4,806
With a score of 3/10, tract 26161413401 in Washtenaw County, MI reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,806. The severe-burden share is 67%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Washtenaw County and the region
Centroid at 42.1970, -83.6016 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 26161413401 scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Tract 26161413401 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 19
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 27%Socioeconomic
- 14%Household composition
- 63%Racial/ethnic minority
- 18%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 15Total filings over 1 yrs
- 14.15%Avg annual filing rate
- 14.2%Peak (2014)
- 15Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.3%Housing insecurity
- 7.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.8%Food insecurity
- 10.8%SNAP enrollment
- 7.3%Transit barriers
- 5.5%No health insurance
- 16.3%Frequent mental distress
- 23.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Tract 26161413401
Cost burden runs 67% here against 46.5% across Washtenaw County. The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1/10.
Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.9/10. Against the Washtenaw County average of 5.0, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.0 points. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.3/10.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 15 filings here across 1 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2014 at 14.2% of renter households. In a typical year about 14.2% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 6% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 2.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Against average income of $126,696, annual rent is just 8%. Statewide the MI average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.