Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally

Lind-Bohanon Eviction Risk: Lower , Fridley

Tract 27003051206 · Anoka County, MN · pop 2,611 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

The Moderate-tier score of 5.8/10 for census tract 27003051206 reflects conditions in the Lind-Bohanon area of Fridley, Minnesota. That is riskier than roughly 68% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

58% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,110 a month against an average household income of $71,014 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 44% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25% Stable renters 19% Owners 56%
Tract context
Occupied units1,100
Renter share44.2%
SVI overall0.77
Poverty rate6.2%
Median income$71,014

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Lind-Bohanon
Moderate
Within parent city
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 7 tracts In Fridley
Very Low
Within county
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 90 tracts In Anoka County
High
Within state
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#675 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fridley and the region

Centroid at 45.0548, -93.2719 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lind-Bohanon scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fridley
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
6.2% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$1,110 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fridley
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fridley
7.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fridley
5.9

How Lind-Bohanon compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lind-Bohanon risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 051206Fridley: 5.25.2Fridleyparent cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 77

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 143Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 9.16%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.2%Peak (2010)
  • 21Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2012
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270030512062009: 38 filings (9.67/100 renter HHs)2010: 49 filings (12.19/100 renter HHs)2011: 35 filings (9.23/100 renter HHs)2012: 21 filings (5.54/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 45% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lind-Bohanon

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 7.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fridley eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Anoka County average of 5.3 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 77th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 12.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27003051206

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27003051206?

Census tract 27003051206 in the Lind-Bohanon neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27003051206?

Median gross rent is $1,110/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27003051206?

6.2% of residents in tract 27003051206 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,611.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27003051206?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 77th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 55th, household 85th, minority 63th, housing 84th.
Q5

Is tract 27003051206 considered part of Lind-Bohanon?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27003051206 fall within Lind-Bohanon (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27003051206?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 143 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 27003051206 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.16% of renter households, peaking at 12.2% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 27003051206 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 27003051206 compare to Fridley overall?

Tract 27003051206 scores 3.7/10, lower than the parent city of Fridley at 5.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fridley eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fridley

Top eight tracts in Fridley ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related