Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #82,639 of 84,120 nationally
Dunmore 2nd Eviction Risk: Lower , Rosemount
Tract 27037061009 · Dakota County, MN · pop 7,166 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
Here is how census tract 27037061009, in the Dunmore 2nd area of Rosemount eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 4.8/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 7,166. It lands near the 32nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 33% of renter households, a high level, and 10% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,864 a month while the average household earns $165,882 a year, roughly 13% of income at the averages. About 11% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units2,490
Renter share11.0%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate1.7%
Median income$165,882
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
33
th percentile
Low
Within county
11
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
6
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rosemount and the region
Centroid at 44.7464, -93.1059 · click any tract to drill in
Why Dunmore 2nd scores 1.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Rosemount
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
1.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,864 rent vs county FMR
6.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rosemount
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rosemount
3.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rosemount
3.3
How Dunmore 2nd compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 3
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 1%Socioeconomic
- 26%Household composition
- 27%Racial/ethnic minority
- 9%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 37Total filings over 5 yrs
- 6.73%Avg annual filing rate
- 17.0%Peak (2009)
- 2Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 86% over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.4%Housing insecurity
- 4.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.1%Food insecurity
- 5.1%SNAP enrollment
- 5.4%Transit barriers
- 5.8%No health insurance
- 14.5%Frequent mental distress
- 21.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Dunmore 2nd
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 6.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rosemount eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Dakota County average of 5.3 and in line with the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 7.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 37 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 6.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 17.0% of renter households in 2009.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 27037061009
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27037061009?
Census tract 27037061009 in the Dunmore 2nd neighborhood scores 1.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 27037061009?
Median gross rent is $1,864/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 27037061009?
1.7% of residents in tract 27037061009 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,166.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 27037061009?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 1th, household 26th, minority 27th, housing 9th.
Q5
Is tract 27037061009 considered part of Dunmore 2nd?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27037061009 fall within Dunmore 2nd (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27037061009?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 37 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27037061009 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.73% of renter households, peaking at 17.0% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 27037061009 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 27037061009 compare to Rosemount overall?
Tract 27037061009 scores 1.1/10, lower than the parent city of Rosemount at 4.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rosemount eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Rosemount
Top eight tracts in Rosemount ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related