Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #82,639 of 84,120 nationally
Glendalough Eviction Risk: Lower , Rosemount
Tract 27037061010 · Dakota County, MN · pop 3,656 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
The Glendalough area of Rosemount is where census tract 27037061010 sits, home to 3,656 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 5.3/10. That is riskier than about 49% of US census tracts.
About 100% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 53% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $215,625 a year. About 4% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.1
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 0%
Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units1,259
Renter share3.6%
SVI overall0.00
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$215,625
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
17
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
11
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
6
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rosemount and the region
Centroid at 44.7557, -93.1398 · click any tract to drill in
Why Glendalough scores 1.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Rosemount
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rosemount
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rosemount
3.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rosemount
3.3
How Glendalough compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 0
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 0%Socioeconomic
- 20%Household composition
- 26%Racial/ethnic minority
- 0%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Glendalough. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.5%Housing insecurity
- 3.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 4.8%Food insecurity
- 2.8%SNAP enrollment
- 3.6%Transit barriers
- 3.6%No health insurance
- 11.4%Frequent mental distress
- 18.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Glendalough
The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rosemount eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Dakota County average of 5.3 and in line with the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 4.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 0th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 27037061010
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27037061010?
Census tract 27037061010 in the Glendalough neighborhood scores 1.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 27037061010?
2.5% of residents in tract 27037061010 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,656.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 27037061010?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 0th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 0th, household 20th, minority 26th, housing 0th.
Q4
Is tract 27037061010 considered part of Glendalough?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27037061010 fall within Glendalough (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q5
What share of households in tract 27037061010 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 27037061010 compare to Rosemount overall?
Tract 27037061010 scores 1.1/10, lower than the parent city of Rosemount at 4.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rosemount eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Rosemount
Top eight tracts in Rosemount ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related