Glendalough Eviction Risk: Lower , Rosemount
Tract 27037061010 · Dakota County, MN · pop 3,656 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Tract 27037061010 sits in the Glendalough area of Rosemount eviction risk, MN, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. Severe burden reaches 53%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Rosemount and the region
Centroid at 44.7557, -93.1398 · click any tract to drill in
Why Glendalough scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Glendalough compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 0
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 0%Socioeconomic
- 20%Household composition
- 26%Racial/ethnic minority
- 0%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Glendalough. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.5%Housing insecurity
- 3.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 4.8%Food insecurity
- 2.8%SNAP enrollment
- 3.6%Transit barriers
- 3.6%No health insurance
- 11.4%Frequent mental distress
- 18.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Glendalough
Against Dakota County at 45.6%, 100% of renters here are cost-burdened. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10.
Food insecurity runs 4.8% against 17.8% nationally. It sits 1.2 points below the Dakota County average of 4.2.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.2% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Only 4% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1/10. Statewide the MN average is 4.5, so this tract runs 1.5 points cooler.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 27037061010
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27037061010?
What is the poverty rate in tract 27037061010?
How socially vulnerable is tract 27037061010?
Is tract 27037061010 considered part of Glendalough?
What share of households in tract 27037061010 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 27037061010 compare to Rosemount overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Rosemount
Top eight tracts in Rosemount ranked by composite eviction-risk score.