Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #44,239 of 84,120 nationally
Dunmore Eviction Risk: Moderate , Rosemount
Tract 27037061008 · Dakota County, MN · pop 2,129 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
27037061008 is a census tract in the Dunmore area of Rosemount, MN. It scores 4.3/10 for landlords. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.2/10.
Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19%
Stable renters 20%
Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units999
Renter share39.0%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate4.6%
Median income$78,125
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
57
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
57
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rosemount and the region
Centroid at 44.7404, -93.1272 · click any tract to drill in
Why Dunmore scores 4.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Rosemount
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
4.6% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,412 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rosemount
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rosemount
3.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rosemount
3.3
How Dunmore compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 64
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 46%Socioeconomic
- 44%Household composition
- 18%Racial/ethnic minority
- 96%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 97Total filings over 5 yrs
- 7.61%Avg annual filing rate
- 13.8%Peak (2009)
- 18Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 36% over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.5%Housing insecurity
- 5.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.6%Food insecurity
- 7.3%SNAP enrollment
- 6.7%Transit barriers
- 8.6%No health insurance
- 14.7%Frequent mental distress
- 30.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Dunmore
21% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 97 filings here across 5 tracked years. SNAP participation runs 7.3% against 15.2% nationally.
Average gross rent is $1,412, 14% below the Rosemount average. Food insecurity runs 10.6% against 17.8% nationally.
Filings peaked in 2009 at 13.8% of renter households. In a typical year about 7.6% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 47% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.8/10.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
48% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. It tracks the Dakota County average of 4.2 closely.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 27037061008
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27037061008?
Census tract 27037061008 in the Dunmore neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 27037061008?
Median gross rent is $1,412/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 27037061008?
4.6% of residents in tract 27037061008 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,129.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 27037061008?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 46th, household 44th, minority 18th, housing 96th.
Q5
Is tract 27037061008 considered part of Dunmore?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27037061008 fall within Dunmore (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27037061008?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 97 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27037061008 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.61% of renter households, peaking at 13.8% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 27037061008 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 27037061008 compare to Rosemount overall?
Tract 27037061008 scores 4.3/10, higher than the parent city of Rosemount at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rosemount eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Rosemount
Top eight tracts in Rosemount ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related