Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #61,757 of 84,120 nationally

Sherwood Park Neighborhood Eviction Risk: Lower , Maplewood

Tract 27123042302 · Ramsey County, MN · pop 4,814 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

In the Sherwood Park Neighborhood neighborhood of Maplewood, census tract 27123042302 scores 5.5/10 for eviction risk. It lands near the 57th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

46% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,267 monthly, set against $95,813 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. Renters make up 28% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 15% Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units1,805
Renter share28.0%
SVI overall0.70
Poverty rate4.4%
Median income$95,813

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Sherwood Park Neighborhood
Low
Within parent city
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 9 tracts In Maplewood
Low
Within county
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#116 of 143 tracts In Ramsey County
Very Low
Within state
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#884 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Maplewood and the region

Centroid at 45.0029, -93.0554 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sherwood Park Neighborhood scores 2.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Maplewood
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
4.4% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$1,267 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Maplewood
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Maplewood
6.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Maplewood
6.1

How Sherwood Park Neighborhood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sherwood Park Neighborhood risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.82.8This tracttract 042302Maplewood: 4.94.9Maplewoodparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 70

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 136Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 4.26%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.0%Peak (2009)
  • 16Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 271230423022009: 24 filings (8.02/100 renter HHs)2010: 22 filings (5.26/100 renter HHs)2011: 19 filings (3.49/100 renter HHs)2012: 13 filings (2.39/100 renter HHs)2013: 24 filings (4.40/100 renter HHs)2014: 18 filings (3.30/100 renter HHs)2015: 16 filings (2.94/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 33% over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 131Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.24×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2020-02-01: 4 filings (2.90× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.72× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.72× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.47× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.62× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 13 filings (5.46× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (2.29× baseline)2022-08-01: 7 filings (7.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (2.17× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (2.36× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (0.94× baseline)2023-01-01: 8 filings (6.40× baseline)2023-02-01: 5 filings (3.62× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (1.85× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (1.79× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (0.84× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 3 filings (2.17× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (1.42× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (0.47× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (0.84× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.72× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (1.42× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2024-12-01: 6 filings (2.83× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (2.17× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (2.47× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (3.57× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2025-07-01: 5 filings (2.86× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.72× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (0.94× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.47× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Sherwood Park Neighborhood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sherwood Park Neighborhood

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Maplewood eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Ramsey County average of 6.0 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27123042302

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27123042302?

Census tract 27123042302 in the Sherwood Park Neighborhood neighborhood scores 2.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27123042302?

Median gross rent is $1,267/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27123042302?

4.4% of residents in tract 27123042302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,814.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27123042302?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 70th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 68th, minority 66th, housing 94th.
Q5

Is tract 27123042302 considered part of Sherwood Park Neighborhood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27123042302 fall within Sherwood Park Neighborhood (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27123042302?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 136 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 27123042302 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.26% of renter households, peaking at 8.0% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 27123042302 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.24× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 27123042302 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 27123042302 compare to Maplewood overall?

Tract 27123042302 scores 2.8/10, lower than the parent city of Maplewood at 4.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Maplewood eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 27123042302 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Maplewood

Top eight tracts in Maplewood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related