Skip to content
Little Bitterroot Lake, Montana eviction risk overview
City brief · 156 residents

Little Bitterroot Lake, MT Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Sanders County · Population 156

In 2026
Risk score
1.5
VERY LOW

17th percentile, Montana.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.1 Average1.7 Now1.5
10 5 1976 · score 1.3 1977 · score 1.3 1978 · score 1.4 1979 · score 1.4 1980 · score 1.2 1981 · score 1.2 1982 · score 1.2 1983 · score 1.1 1984 · score 1.1 1985 · score 1.1 1986 · score 1.1 1987 · score 1.1 1988 · score 1.6 1989 · score 1.6 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.6 1992 · score 1.9 1993 · score 1.9 1994 · score 1.9 1995 · score 1.9 1996 · score 1.8 1997 · score 1.8 1998 · score 1.8 1999 · score 1.8 2000 · score 1.5 2001 · score 1.5 2002 · score 1.6 2003 · score 1.5 2004 · score 1.6 2005 · score 1.6 2006 · score 1.7 2007 · score 1.7 2008 · score 2.3 2009 · score 2.4 2010 · score 2.4 2011 · score 2.5 2012 · score 2.0 2013 · score 2.0 2014 · score 2.0 2015 · score 2.1 2016 · score 1.8 2017 · score 1.9 2018 · score 1.9 2019 · score 2.0 2020 · score 2.3 2021 · score 2.3 2022 · score 2.3 2023 · score 2.3 2024 · score 2.1 2025 · score 2.1 2026 · score 1.5

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.2 Regional 3.2 State 1.7 Economic 1.0 Supply 3.7 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 2.0 Tenant 3.7 Housing 1.1 1.5 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +55.1% (2024)
    3.2
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.2
  3. State political climate
    Montana legislature & governorship
    1.7
  4. Economic stress
    11.8% poverty · 11.0% unemp.
    1.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $610 average · 12.7% renters
    3.7
  6. Rent Control risk
    30.3% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    28 days filing → judgment
    2.0
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    12.7% renters
    3.7
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    1.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Little Bitterroot Lake and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Little Bitterroot Lake compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Sanders County
Moderate
#7 of 11 cities
Rank in county, 40th percentileBottomTop
#7 of 11 cities in Sanders County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Montana
Very Low
#435 of 496 cities
Rank in state, 12th percentileBottomTop
#435 of 496 cities in Montana for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Little Bitterroot Lake risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Little Bitterroot : 1.51.5Little Bitterroot This cityCounty: 1.91.9Countyavg in countyState: 2.22.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 1.5
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 1.5/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 28d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $610/mo. A contested eviction takes 28 days and costs $771-$2,493 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 12.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 156 residents, 12.7% rent. 30% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 11.8% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.2
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.2 and 3.2 (GOP margin +55.1% (2024)). State climate at 1.7, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.7
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.7/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2, housing court bias 1.1, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.0 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 1
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 1. Supply constraint: 3.7. The numbers behind those: 11.8% poverty, 11.0% unemployment, 30% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Little Bitterroot Lake sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Billings, MT · 30d · ~$2.1k all-in ($68/day) · score 1.7 Billings Missoula, MT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3 Missoula Great Falls, MT · 25d · ~$1.7k all-in ($66/day) · score 1.5 Great Falls Bozeman, MT · 29d · ~$1.7k all-in ($59/day) · score 2.5 Bozeman Spokane, WA · 160d · ~$12.5k all-in ($78/day) · score 6.3 Spokane Spokane Valley, WA · 174d · ~$14.2k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.4 Spokane Valley Coeur d'Alene, ID · 25d · ~$1.5k all-in ($60/day) · score 2.5 Coeur d'Alene Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Little Bitterroot Lake
Little Bitterroot Lake · 28d · ~$1.6k all-in ($58/day) · score 1.5 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Little Bitterroot Lake, MT

Landlording in Little Bitterroot Lake, Montana, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 1.5/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Little Bitterroot Lake is a city of 156 residents where 12.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 30.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $610/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Little Bitterroot Lake eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Little Bitterroot Lake closes 28 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Little Bitterroot Lake's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Little Bitterroot Lake runs $771 to $2,493 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 28 days of typical timeline and $610/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 3.7/10 in Little Bitterroot Lake, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Montana, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Little Bitterroot Lake: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Montana's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,493 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Little Bitterroot Lake

Trap · MONT. CODE 70-24 URLTA
The 2.1/10 score weighs nine sub-factors. The most relevant for landlords are court bias, eviction process difficulty, and supply constraint. See the sub-score breakdown above. State-level framework: Mont. Code 70-24 URLTA.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What is the fastest way to evict a tenant in Little Bitterroot Lake?

The fastest way is through a 3-day pay-or-quit notice for non-payment of rent, followed immediately by filing an eviction lawsuit if the tenant doesn't comply. A typical eviction timeline is 28 days, but a "cash for keys" agreement can sometimes be even faster if the tenant is cooperative.

Q2

Can I charge whatever I want for a security deposit in Montana?

Yes, Montana law does not set a cap on security deposits. However, charging an excessively high deposit might deter good tenants or be seen as unreasonable by a court. Most landlords charge 1-2 months' rent.

Q3

Do I need a lawyer to evict a tenant in Sanders County?

You are not legally required to have a lawyer for an eviction in Justice Court. However, it is highly recommended, especially if the tenant contests the eviction. A lawyer ensures all legal steps are followed correctly, preventing costly delays or dismissals. Consider calling an attorney when you prepare to file the formal complaint.

Q4

What if my tenant refuses to leave after the court orders an eviction?

If the court grants you a Writ of Possession and the tenant still refuses to leave, you must involve the Sanders County Sheriff. Only the Sheriff can legally remove a tenant from the property. Do not attempt to physically remove them yourself.

Q5

Are there rent control laws in Little Bitterroot Lake or Montana?

No, there are no statewide rent control laws in Montana, and Little Bitterroot Lake does not have any local rent control ordinances. This means you are generally free to set rent prices as you see fit, subject to lease agreements.

Q6

How quickly do I have to return a security deposit in Montana?

You must return the security deposit within 10 days if there are no deductions. If you make deductions for damages or unpaid rent, you have 30 days to provide an itemized statement of deductions and return the remaining balance to the tenant. Miss this deadline, and you risk losing your right to keep any of the deposit.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 1.5/10 places Little Bitterroot Lake in the 17th percentile of Montana cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.