Skip to content
Spokane, Washington eviction risk overview
Ranked #570 of 1,865 nationally

Spokane, WA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Spokane County · Population 230,293

In 2026
Risk score
5.9
ELEVATED

80th percentile, Washington.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min3.5 Average4.4 Now5.9
6.6 3.5 1976 · score 3.6 1977 · score 3.5 1978 · score 3.6 1979 · score 3.6 1980 · score 3.6 1981 · score 3.7 1982 · score 3.8 1983 · score 3.8 1984 · score 3.7 1985 · score 3.7 1986 · score 3.8 1987 · score 3.8 1988 · score 4.2 1989 · score 4.2 1990 · score 4.2 1991 · score 4.2 1992 · score 4.1 1993 · score 4.2 1994 · score 4.2 1995 · score 4.2 1996 · score 4.4 1997 · score 4.5 1998 · score 4.4 1999 · score 4.4 2000 · score 4.4 2001 · score 4.4 2002 · score 4.4 2003 · score 4.4 2004 · score 4.3 2005 · score 4.2 2006 · score 4.2 2007 · score 4.3 2008 · score 4.3 2009 · score 4.4 2010 · score 4.4 2011 · score 4.4 2012 · score 4.4 2013 · score 4.5 2014 · score 4.5 2015 · score 4.5 2016 · score 4.5 2017 · score 4.6 2018 · score 4.9 2019 · score 5.2 2020 · score 6.0 2021 · score 6.6 2022 · score 5.8 2023 · score 5.7 2024 · score 5.8 2025 · score 5.9 2026 · score 5.9

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 5.0 Regional 5.0 State 7.5 Economic 6.5 Supply 5.0 Rent Control 5.0 Eviction 5.5 Tenant 4.5 Housing 5.5 5.9 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +5.0% (2024)
    5.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    5.0
  3. State political climate
    Washington legislature & governorship
    7.5
  4. Economic stress
    14.6% poverty · 6.0% unemp.
    6.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,215 average · 41.2% renters
    5.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    31.6% of income on rent
    5.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    160 days filing → judgment
    5.5
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    41.2% renters
    4.5
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.5
Geographic context

Risk heat across Spokane and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Spokane compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Spokane County
Elevated
#9 of 21 cities
Rank in county, 60th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 21 cities in Spokane County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Washington
Elevated
#177 of 637 cities
Rank in state, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#177 of 637 cities in Washington for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Spokane risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Spokane: 5.95.9SpokaneThis cityCounty: 5.95.9Countyavg in countyState: 6.16.1Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.15.1U.S.national avg

Washington landlord-tenant law

Eviction rules are set at the state level. These are the Washington statutes, timelines and dollar figures that govern every property on this page.

Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 5.9
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 5.9/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+2.3 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 160d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,215/mo. A contested eviction takes 160 days and costs $6,837–$18,078 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026
  3. 41.2%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 230,293 residents, 41.2% rent. 32% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 14.6% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026
  4. 5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 5 and 5 (GOP margin +5.0% (2024)). State climate at 7.5, a tenant-leaning legislature.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 7.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 7.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.5, housing court bias 5.5, rent-control risk 5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.5 since '00
    197620012026
  6. 6.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.5. Supply constraint: 5. The numbers behind those: 14.6% poverty, 6.0% unemployment, 32% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Spokane sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Spokane Valley, WA · 174d · ~$14.2k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.1 Spokane Valley Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Tacoma, WA · 161d · ~$13.7k all-in ($85/day) · score 7 Tacoma Vancouver, WA · 160d · ~$15.3k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.6 Vancouver Bellevue, WA · 172d · ~$15.2k all-in ($88/day) · score 7 Bellevue Kent, WA · 173d · ~$15.3k all-in ($89/day) · score 6.6 Kent Everett, WA · 146d · ~$14.1k all-in ($96/day) · score 6.5 Everett Renton, WA · 170d · ~$14.7k all-in ($86/day) · score 6.6 Renton Federal Way, WA · 167d · ~$13.5k all-in ($81/day) · score 6.6 Federal Way Yakima, WA · 152d · ~$12.6k all-in ($83/day) · score 6.1 Yakima Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.6 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.3 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.6 New York Spokane
Spokane · 160d · ~$12.5k all-in ($78/day) · score 5.9 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Spokane, WA

Landlording in Spokane, Washington, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 5.9/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Spokane is a city of 230,293 residents where 41.2% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 31.6% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,215/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Spokane eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.5/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Spokane closes 160 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Spokane's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Spokane runs $6,837 to $18,078 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 160 days of typical timeline and $1,215/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 4.5/10 in Spokane, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Washington, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Spokane: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Washington's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $18,078 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Spokane

Trap · NORTHWEST JUSTICE PROJECT
The Spokane County District Court has been processing the HB 1236 framework since 2021. Contested-case rates climbed roughly 30 percent in the first year of statewide just-cause and have stabilized at that elevated level. Northwest Justice Project staffs Spokane eviction defense actively.
Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
The pending statewide rent-control fight: HB 1217 (2025 session) would cap annual increases at CPI plus 7 percent on buildings older than 12 years, overriding RCW 35.21.830 preemption. The bill's passage would materially change Spokane's acquisitions math. Operators acquiring here in 2025 are pricing material policy risk into the next legislative session.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What is "just cause" eviction in Washington?

Just cause means you need a specific, legally defined reason to terminate a tenancy in Washington, even for month-to-month leases. Reasons include non-payment of rent, lease violations, or specific situations like an owner moving in, but not simply wanting the tenant out. This is a statewide rule under RCW § 59.18, and it makes evicting much harder for landlords without clear grounds.

Q2

Can I charge an application fee in Spokane?

Yes, you can charge an application fee in Washington to cover the cost of screening. However, you must only charge the actual cost of the screening report (credit, background, etc.) and you must provide a written disclosure of what the fee covers. You cannot profit from application fees.

Q3

What if my tenant damages the property beyond the security deposit?

If the cost of damages exceeds the security deposit, you can sue the tenant in small claims court for the difference. However, collecting on such a judgment can be difficult if the tenant has limited assets or moves out of state. Proper tenant screening is key to minimizing this risk.

Q4

Is rent control a risk in Spokane?

Washington state currently prohibits local jurisdictions from enacting rent control, so there is no rent control in Spokane. However, there's ongoing political pressure statewide, and legislative changes could occur. Always stay updated on Washington rent control rules as the political climate can shift.

Q5

How quickly can I get a tenant out if they violate the lease?

For lease violations (other than non-payment), you typically need to serve a 10-day notice to comply or vacate. If the tenant doesn't fix the issue within 10 days, then you can proceed with an unlawful detainer. The timeline for these evictions can be just as long as non-payment evictions, if not longer, especially if the tenant disputes the violation.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 5.9/10 places Spokane in the 80th percentile of Washington cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.