In court-decided eviction outcomes for Weeping Water, NE, tenants prevail in roughly 20.0% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses, longer calendars, and more required documentation, and landlord-friendliness drops as this rises.
Timeline
30d
filing → judgment
From the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Weeping Water, NE until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 30 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent and higher carry costs for landlords.
Cost range
$1.1–2.6k
legal + lost rent
A typical eviction in Weeping Water, NE costs landlords $1,072 to $2,636 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent during the calendar between filing and possession.
Average rent
$1,021
25% stretched on rent
Average gross rent in Weeping Water, NE is $1,021 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey (5-year 2023). 25% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent, the federal cost-burden threshold.
Renters
27.8%
of households
27.8% of occupied housing units in Weeping Water, NE are renter-occupied (vs owner-occupied). A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings, more turnover, and a more active rental market.
Poverty
4.0%
8.7% unemp.
4.0% of Weeping Water, NE residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 8.7%. Both feed into the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model because rent payment problems track poverty + joblessness more reliably than any other single signal.
Time machine
Scrub 50 years
197619861996200620162026
2026
● LIVE · today◀ REPLAY · historical
Nine-axis profile
9-axis profile · today
Shape of the risk surface
1 landlord · 10 tenant
Sub-scores · with sparkline
Where the score comes from
1 → 10 scale
Local political climate
GOP margin +37.2% (2024)
3.9
Regional political climate
County-weighted neighbor mix
3.9
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
4.0% poverty · 8.7% unemp.
5.6
Supply constraint
$1,021 average · 27.8% renters
5.3
Rent Control risk
24.9% of income on rent
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
30 days filing → judgment
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
27.8% renters
6.0
Housing court bias
County bench composition
4.1
Geographic context
Risk heat across Weeping Water and the region
Click any city to see its score
How Weeping Water compares
Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Cass County
High
#3of 15 cities
#3 of 15 cities in Cass County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Nebraska
High
#87of 593 cities
#87 of 593 cities in Nebraska for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Score story
Six-stop tour of the risk profile
2.9
/ 10 · LOW
The verdict
A Low-tier market.
Composite 2.9/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.
50-yr trend+0.8 over 50 yr
197620012026
Steady ratchet · no large swings
30d
Typical timeline
The money
What renting (and evicting) looks like.
Rent published at $1,021/mo. A contested eviction takes 30 days and costs $1,072–$2,636 per case.
50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
197620012026
Court-clerk data lands in the next release.
27.8%
Renters
The renters
Who you'll be renting to.
Out of 1,407 residents, 27.8% rent. 25% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 4.0% below the poverty line.
50-yr trendRenter share rising
197620012026
ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.
3.9
Local + regional
The politics
Light-statute interior market.
Local & regional political climate score 3.9 and 3.9 (GOP margin +37.2% (2024)). State climate at 1.8, a mid-range statehouse.
50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
197620012026
Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.
1.8
State politics
The process
Moderate calendar, moderate friction.
State political climate 1.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.3, housing court bias 4.1, rent-control risk 5.4. Standard process speed for the state.
50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.7 since '00
197620012026
Court-clerk data lands in the next release.
5.6
Economic stress
The stress
Economic pressure is the background risk.
Economic stress: 5.6. Supply constraint: 5.3. The numbers behind those: 4.0% poverty, 8.7% unemployment, 25% of income on rent.
50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
197620012026
Mirrors BLS unemployment series.
US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost
Weeping Water sits in the quick & cheap quadrant
Bubble size = population · color = risk score
Weeping Water · 30d · ~$1.9k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.9National average: 58d · $4.6k all-inHover any bubble for stats · click to openColor: 0–4 4–7 7–10
Landlording in Weeping Water, Nebraska, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.9/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.
Weeping Water is a city of 1,407 residents where 27.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 24.9% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,021/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.
01Process
How Weeping Water eviction process actually works
Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.3/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Weeping Water closes 30 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.
The slow part of Weeping Water's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.
02Cost
What it costs (and how long it takes)
An all-in eviction in Weeping Water runs $1,072 to $2,636 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.
For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 30 days of typical timeline and $1,021/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.
03Operations
Security deposits, screening, and lease terms
Tenant organizing strength scores 6/10 in Weeping Water, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.4/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:
Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Nebraska, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy
What an everyday landlord should actually do here
If you own one to four units in Weeping Water: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.
The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Nebraska's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,636 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.
04bPractical traps
Local traps to avoid in Weeping Water
Trap · 4.1/10
For landlords, the 4.7/10 score is most actionable when combined with Cass County's specific court behavior. Housing-court bias sub-score: 4.1/10. Standard documentation and prompt action typically resolve cases quickly.
05FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Q1
What if my tenant just disappears?
If a tenant abandons the property in Weeping Water, you generally need to follow specific procedures to legally reclaim it. Nebraska law requires you to send a notice to the tenant's last known address, giving them a reasonable time (usually 7-14 days) to respond or reclaim their property. Document everything, including property left behind. If they don't respond, you can then take possession. Don't just change the locks; follow the law to avoid claims of illegal eviction.
Q2
Can I charge late fees on rent in Weeping Water?
Yes, you can charge late fees in Weeping Water, but they must be reasonable and clearly stated in your lease agreement. While Nebraska law doesn't specify a maximum amount, excessive late fees could be challenged in court. A common practice is a flat fee or a small percentage of the rent, typically applied a few days after the rent due date. Make sure your lease spells out when the fee kicks in and how much it is.
Q3
Do I need an attorney for an eviction in Cass County?
You are not legally required to have an attorney for an eviction in Cass County, but it's highly recommended, especially if this is your first eviction or if the tenant is contesting it. An attorney ensures all paperwork is filed correctly, notices are served properly, and you present your case effectively in court. Mistakes can lead to delays or even dismissal, costing you more in the long run. Given the Cass County eviction guide, legal counsel can be a good investment.
Q4
What if my tenant claims I didn't make repairs?
Tenants in Nebraska have the right to a habitable living space. If a tenant claims you didn't make necessary repairs, they must generally provide you with written notice and a reasonable time to fix the issue. If you fail to do so, they may have options like repairing and deducting (within limits) or terminating the lease. However, they cannot generally withhold rent entirely without a court order. Always respond promptly to repair requests and keep detailed records of communication and work performed. This protects you in court.
A 2.9/10 places Weeping Water in the 90th percentile of Nebraska cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.
Cities with similar eviction risk to Weeping Water (2.9/10)
Same risk band nationally · click any city for its full breakdown.
