Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #57,812 of 84,120 nationally

Aksarben Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Omaha

Tract 31055006906 · Douglas County, NE · pop 3,367 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

With a score of 3.5/10, tract 31055006906 in the Aksarben Village area of Omaha, NE reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,367 residents. The severe-burden share is 28%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 23% Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units1,633
Renter share39.1%
SVI overall0.28
Poverty rate5.2%
Median income$69,222

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Aksarben Village
Very Low
Within parent city
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#87 of 157 tracts In Omaha
Moderate
Within county
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#87 of 163 tracts In Douglas County
Moderate
Within state
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#241 of 553 tracts In Nebraska
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Omaha and the region

Centroid at 41.2288, -96.0334 · click any tract to drill in

Why Aksarben Village scores 3.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Omaha
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
5.2% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,463 rent vs county FMR
6.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Omaha
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Omaha
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Omaha
3.0

How Aksarben Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Aksarben Village risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.5This tracttract 0069063.7Omahaparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county3.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 28

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 122Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 1.67%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.7%Peak (2013)
  • 15Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 31055006906
Filings climbed 88% over the past 13 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Aksarben Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Aksarben Village

The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.3/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10.

Average gross rent is $1,463, 23% above the Omaha average. SNAP participation runs 5.7% against 15.2% nationally. The voucher gap is 16.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Food insecurity runs 9.2% against 17.8% nationally. Court records carry 122 eviction filings across 13 observed years. The worst year on record was 2013, when 2.7% of renter households were served.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 1.7% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #57,812 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 31055006906

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31055006906?

Census tract 31055006906 in the Aksarben Village neighborhood scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 31055006906?

Median gross rent is $1,463/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 31055006906?

5.2% of residents in tract 31055006906 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,367.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 31055006906?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 28th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 23th, minority 36th, housing 69th.
Q5

Is tract 31055006906 considered part of Aksarben Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31055006906 fall within Aksarben Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31055006906?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 122 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 31055006906 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.67% of renter households, peaking at 2.7% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 31055006906 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 31055006906 compare to Omaha overall?

Tract 31055006906 scores 3.5/10, right in line with the parent city of Omaha at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Omaha eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 31055006906 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Omaha

Top eight tracts in Omaha ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related