Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,159 of 84,120 nationally

Victorian Square Eviction Risk: Moderate , Sparks

Tract 32031001903 · Washoe, NV · pop 4,200 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

The Moderate-tier score of 5.1/10 for census tract 32031001903 reflects conditions in the Victorian Square area of Sparks, Nevada. That is riskier than roughly 42% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 46% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,246 monthly, set against $62,128 in average yearly household income, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 77% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 35% Stable renters 42% Owners 23%
Tract context
Occupied units1,757
Renter share76.9%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate27.1%
Median income$62,128

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 8 tracts In Victorian Square
High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 26 tracts In Sparks
Very High
Within county
79 th percentile
Rank, 79th percentileLowHigh
#30 of 139 tracts In Washoe
High
Within state
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#280 of 779 tracts In Nevada
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sparks and the region

Centroid at 39.5424, -119.7619 · click any tract to drill in

Why Victorian Square scores 4.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sparks
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.2
State political climate
Nevada legislature & governorship
3.7
Economic stress
27.1% poverty · this tract
6.8
Supply constraint
$1,246 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sparks
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sparks
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sparks
3.0

How Victorian Square compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Victorian Square risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.64.6This tracttract 001903Sparks: 4.14.1Sparksparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.24.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 99

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Victorian Square. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Victorian Square

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 6.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Sparks eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Washoe County average of 4.9 and below the Nevada statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 23.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 14.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 99th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 32031001903

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 32031001903?

Census tract 32031001903 in the Victorian Square neighborhood scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 32031001903?

Median gross rent is $1,246/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 32031001903?

27.1% of residents in tract 32031001903 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,200.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 32031001903?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 77th, minority 77th, housing 99th.
Q5

Is tract 32031001903 considered part of Victorian Square?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 32031001903 fall within Victorian Square (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 32031001903 struggle to pay rent?

About 23.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 32031001903 compare to Sparks overall?

Tract 32031001903 scores 4.6/10, higher than the parent city of Sparks at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sparks eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sparks

Top eight tracts in Sparks ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related