Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally

Victorian Square Eviction Risk: Moderate , Sparks

Tract 32031003002 · Washoe, NV · pop 2,792 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 32031003002 covers part of the Victorian Square area of Sparks, NV, and scores 5/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,792. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1.5/10.

Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32% Stable renters 31% Owners 37%
Tract context
Occupied units1,219
Renter share63.2%
SVI overall0.97
Poverty rate10.7%
Median income$51,542

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 8 tracts In Victorian Square
Elevated
Within parent city
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 26 tracts In Sparks
Very High
Within county
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#37 of 139 tracts In Washoe
Elevated
Within state
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#285 of 779 tracts In Nevada
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sparks and the region

Centroid at 39.5382, -119.7415 · click any tract to drill in

Why Victorian Square scores 5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sparks
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.2
State political climate
Nevada legislature & governorship
3.7
Economic stress
10.7% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$1,214 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sparks
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sparks
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sparks
3.0

How Victorian Square compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Victorian Square risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.05.0This tracttract 003002Sparks: 4.04.0Sparksparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 97

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Victorian Square. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Victorian Square

23% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Average gross rent is $1,214, 29% below the Sparks average.

Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.1/10. Cost burden runs roughly one in two here against 44.0% across Washoe County.

Running cool, tenant-organizing strength reads 2.5/10. SNAP participation runs 25.0% against 15.2% nationally.

Adults with no health insurance runs 20.6% against 11.3% nationally. Against the Washoe County average of 4.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.9 points. Nationally it ranks #32,842 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

Annual rent works out to 28% of average household income of $51,542. 63% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 32031003002

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 32031003002?

Census tract 32031003002 in the Victorian Square neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 32031003002?

Median gross rent is $1,214/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 32031003002?

10.7% of residents in tract 32031003002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,792.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 32031003002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 97th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 91th, minority 75th, housing 87th.
Q5

Is tract 32031003002 considered part of Victorian Square?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 32031003002 fall within Victorian Square (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 32031003002 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 32031003002 compare to Sparks overall?

Tract 32031003002 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Sparks at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sparks eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sparks

Top eight tracts in Sparks ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related