Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #58,847 of 84,120 nationally

Victorian Square Eviction Risk: Moderate , Sparks

Tract 32031003001 · Washoe, NV · pop 5,250 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 32031003001 sits in the Victorian Square neighborhood of Sparks, Nevada. It has a population of 5,250 and an eviction-risk score of 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). 44% of renters here pay 30%+ of their household income on rent, with 17% severely cost-burdened (≥50%). Median gross rent is $1,479/month against a median household income of $77,891 — roughly 23% rent-to-income at the medians.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20% Stable renters 25% Owners 55%
Tract context
Occupied units1,449
Renter share45.1%
SVI overall0.77
Poverty rate14.5%
Median income$77,891

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
57 th percentile
Rank — 57th percentileBottomTop
#4 of 8 tracts In Victorian Square
Elevated
Within parent city
44 th percentile
Rank — 44th percentileBottomTop
#15 of 26 tracts In Sparks
Moderate
Within county
36 th percentile
Rank — 36th percentileBottomTop
#90 of 139 tracts In Washoe
Low
Within state
15 th percentile
Rank — 15th percentileBottomTop
#664 of 779 tracts In Nevada
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sparks and the region

Centroid at 39.5429, -119.7452 · click any tract to drill in

Why Victorian Square scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sparks
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.2
State political climate
Nevada legislature & governorship
3.7
Economic stress
14.5% poverty · this tract
3.6
Supply constraint
$1,479 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sparks
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sparks
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sparks
3.0

How Victorian Square compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Victorian Square risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.74.7This tracttract 003001Sparks: 3.83.8Sparksparent cityCounty: 4.94.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 77

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Victorian Square. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Frequently asked

About tract 32031003001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 32031003001?

Census tract 32031003001 in the Victorian Square neighborhood scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 32031003001?

Median gross rent is $1,479/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 32031003001?

14.5% of residents in tract 32031003001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,250.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 32031003001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 77th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 76th, minority 75th, housing 37th.

Q5

Is tract 32031003001 considered part of Victorian Square?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 32031003001 fall within Victorian Square (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).

Q6

What share of households in tract 32031003001 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.2% also reported utility shutoff threats — a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

Q7

How does tract 32031003001 compare to Sparks overall?

Tract 32031003001 scores 4.7/10 — higher than the parent city of Sparks at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sparks eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sparks

Top eight tracts in Sparks ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related