Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #10,320 of 84,120 nationally

Garfield Park Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 34003030401 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 3,477 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

With a score of 7.5/10, tract 34003030401 in the Garfield Park area of Lodi, NJ reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,477 residents. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.6/10.

Risk score
7.5
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26% Stable renters 29% Owners 45%
Tract context
Occupied units1,216
Renter share55.4%
SVI overall0.32
Poverty rate5.5%
Median income$89,275

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#10 of 14 tracts In Garfield Park
Low
Within parent city
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Garfield
Low
Within county
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#47 of 203 tracts In Bergen County
High
Within state
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#515 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Garfield and the region

Centroid at 40.8665, -74.0861 · click any tract to drill in

Why Garfield Park scores 7.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Garfield
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.5% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,838 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Garfield
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Garfield
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Garfield
6.9

How Garfield Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Garfield Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.5This tracttract 0304017.0Garfieldparent city6.3Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 32

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Garfield Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Garfield Park

On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.4/10. Severe burden reaches 18%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.9/10.

It sits 1.2 points above the Bergen County average of 6.3. SNAP participation runs 6.9% against 15.2% nationally. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

On the national scale it lands near the 88th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the NJ average is 6.0, so this tract runs 1.5 points hotter.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 34003030401

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003030401?

Census tract 34003030401 in the Garfield Park neighborhood scores 7.5/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34003030401?

Median gross rent is $1,838/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34003030401?

5.5% of residents in tract 34003030401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,477.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34003030401?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 32th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 42th, minority 77th, housing 27th.
Q5

Is tract 34003030401 considered part of Garfield Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34003030401 fall within Garfield Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 34003030401 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 34003030401 compare to Garfield overall?

Tract 34003030401 scores 7.5/10, higher than the parent city of Garfield at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Garfield eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 34003030401 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 23% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Garfield

Top eight tracts in Garfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related