Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #6,676 of 84,120 nationally
Biedman Eviction Risk: High , Camden
Tract 34007601000 · Camden County, NJ · pop 5,645 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
With a score of 8.2/10, tract 34007601000 in the Biedman area of Camden, NJ reads high for landlord eviction risk. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
Risk score
8.2
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26%
Stable renters 21%
Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units1,672
Renter share47.1%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate12.4%
Median income$61,513
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
84
th percentile
High
Within state
84
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Camden and the region
Centroid at 39.9612, -75.0902 · click any tract to drill in
Why Biedman scores 8.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Camden
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.4% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$1,213 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Camden
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Camden
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Camden
7.0
How Biedman compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 94
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 96%Socioeconomic
- 94%Household composition
- 97%Racial/ethnic minority
- 61%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 62%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,229Total filings over 6 yrs
- 24.38%Avg annual filing rate
- 27.7%Peak (2014)
- 173Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 19% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Biedman. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 29.2%Housing insecurity
- 15.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 35.9%Food insecurity
- 22.3%SNAP enrollment
- 16.0%Transit barriers
- 31.1%No health insurance
- 18.3%Frequent mental distress
- 35.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Biedman
Against the Camden County average of 5.7, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.5 points. Adults with no health insurance runs 31.1% against 11.3% nationally.
Severe burden reaches 21%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.7/10. Against Camden County at 48.5%, 56% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 1,229 filings here across 6 tracked years. Running hot, local political climate reads 7/10.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 15.0% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Filings peaked in 2014 at 27.7% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 24.4% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 92% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007601000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007601000?
Census tract 34007601000 in the Biedman neighborhood scores 8.2/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007601000?
Median gross rent is $1,213/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007601000?
12.4% of residents in tract 34007601000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,645.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007601000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 94th, minority 97th, housing 61th.
Q5
Is tract 34007601000 considered part of Biedman?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34007601000 fall within Biedman (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007601000?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 1,229 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007601000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 24.38% of renter households, peaking at 27.7% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34007601000 struggle to pay rent?
About 29.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34007601000 compare to Camden overall?
Tract 34007601000 scores 8.2/10, higher than the parent city of Camden at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camden eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 34007601000 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Camden
Top eight tracts in Camden ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NJ
Liberty Park
8.8
/ 10 · High
Tract · NJ
Centerville
8.8
/ 10 · High
Tract · NJ
Waterfront South
8.8
/ 10 · High
Tract · NJ
Morgan Village
8.8
/ 10 · High
Tract · NJ
Fairview
8.8
/ 10 · High
Tract · NJ
Gateway
8.8
/ 10 · High
Tract · NJ
Central Waterfront
8.8
/ 10 · High
Tract · NJ
Bergen Square
8.8
/ 10 · High
Related