Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,622 of 84,120 nationally
Lanning Square Eviction Risk: High , Camden
Tract 34007610400 · Camden County, NJ · pop 4,853 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Tract 34007610400 sits in the Lanning Square area of Camden eviction risk, NJ, carrying an eviction-risk score of 8.8/10. It is home to 4,853 residents. It sits 3.1 points above the Camden County average of 5.7.
Risk score
8.8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 27%
Stable renters 37%
Owners 36%
Tract context
Occupied units1,293
Renter share63.8%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate22.5%
Median income$55,076
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
94
th percentile
Very High
Within county
95
th percentile
Very High
Within state
90
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Camden and the region
Centroid at 39.9413, -75.1191 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lanning Square scores 8.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Camden
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
22.5% poverty · this tract
5.6
Supply constraint
$1,284 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Camden
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Camden
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Camden
7.0
How Lanning Square compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 93%Socioeconomic
- 77%Household composition
- 92%Racial/ethnic minority
- 93%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 23%Grade C
- 35%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 988Total filings over 6 yrs
- 26.10%Avg annual filing rate
- 28.1%Peak (2013)
- 152Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 16% over the past 6 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 32.3%Housing insecurity
- 20.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 40.8%Food insecurity
- 32.7%SNAP enrollment
- 19.9%Transit barriers
- 24.4%No health insurance
- 20.9%Frequent mental distress
- 38.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lanning Square
The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.4/10. Severe burden reaches 24%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
SNAP participation runs 32.7% against 15.2% nationally. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.1/10. Adults with no health insurance runs 24.4% against 11.3% nationally.
The poverty rate is 23%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Against Camden County at 48.5%, 42% of renters here are cost-burdened. Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 988 filings here across 6 tracked years.
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7/10. The worst year on record was 2013, when 28.1% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 26.1% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 95% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007610400
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007610400?
Census tract 34007610400 in the Lanning Square neighborhood scores 8.8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007610400?
Median gross rent is $1,284/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007610400?
22.5% of residents in tract 34007610400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,853.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007610400?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 93th, household 77th, minority 92th, housing 93th.
Q5
Is tract 34007610400 considered part of Lanning Square?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34007610400 fall within Lanning Square (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007610400?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 988 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007610400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 26.10% of renter households, peaking at 28.1% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34007610400 struggle to pay rent?
About 32.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 20.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34007610400 compare to Camden overall?
Tract 34007610400 scores 8.8/10, higher than the parent city of Camden at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camden eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 34007610400 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 35% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Camden
Top eight tracts in Camden ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related