Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally
Runnemede Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 34007607200 · Camden County, NJ · pop 4,313
Census tract 34007607200 runs through Runnemede. With 4,313 residents, it scores 6.4/10 for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #12,790 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
39% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,364 a month against an average household income of $95,240 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. About 45% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18%
Stable renters 27%
Owners 55%
Tract context
Occupied units1,855
Renter share45.0%
SVI overall0.68
Poverty rate9.4%
Median income$95,240
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
45
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
55
th percentile
Moderate
National
49
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Runnemede and the region
Centroid at 39.8535, -75.0656 · click any tract to drill in
Why Runnemede scores 3.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Runnemede
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
9.4% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$1,364 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Runnemede
5.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Runnemede
6.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Runnemede
5.0
How Runnemede compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 68
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 64%Socioeconomic
- 59%Household composition
- 43%Racial/ethnic minority
- 73%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 561Total filings over 6 yrs
- 11.85%Avg annual filing rate
- 14.2%Peak (2013)
- 87Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 24% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.5%Housing insecurity
- 7.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 14.5%Food insecurity
- 9.3%SNAP enrollment
- 7.7%Transit barriers
- 10.3%No health insurance
- 17.5%Frequent mental distress
- 28.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Runnemede
The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 6.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Runnemede, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Camden County average of 6.8 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 561 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 11.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 14.2% of renter households in 2013.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 68th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007607200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007607200?
Census tract 34007607200 in Runnemede scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007607200?
Median gross rent is $1,364/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007607200?
9.4% of residents in tract 34007607200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,313.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007607200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 68th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 64th, household 59th, minority 43th, housing 73th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007607200?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 561 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007607200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.85% of renter households, peaking at 14.2% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 34007607200 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 34007607200 compare to Runnemede overall?
Tract 34007607200 scores 3.9/10, lower than the parent city of Runnemede at 7.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Runnemede; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Runnemede
Top eight tracts in Runnemede ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related