Within neighborhood
20
th percentile
Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally
Fairview Eviction Risk: Moderate , Gloucester City
Tract 34007604700 · Camden County, NJ · pop 1,887 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
34007604700 is a census tract in the Fairview area of Oaklyn, NJ. It scores 5/10 for landlords. Population here is 1,887. Average gross rent is $1,988, 60% above the Oaklyn average.
Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%
Stable renters 12%
Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units741
Renter share19.2%
SVI overall0.08
Poverty rate7.2%
Median income$109,044
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
40
th percentile
Low
Within state
36
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Gloucester City and the region
Centroid at 39.8985, -75.0836 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fairview scores 5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Gloucester City
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.2% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,988 rent vs county FMR
6.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Gloucester City
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Gloucester City
7.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Gloucester City
4.7
How Fairview compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 8
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 24%Socioeconomic
- 9%Household composition
- 6%Racial/ethnic minority
- 12%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 56%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 133Total filings over 6 yrs
- 26.86%Avg annual filing rate
- 36.2%Peak (2018)
- 34Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 36% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Fairview. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.8%Housing insecurity
- 5.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.3%Food insecurity
- 5.6%SNAP enrollment
- 5.5%Transit barriers
- 7.2%No health insurance
- 15.8%Frequent mental distress
- 23.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fairview
The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.4/10. Against Camden County at 48.5%, 39% of renters here are cost-burdened.
The severe-burden share is 20%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.8/10.
Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.7/10. SNAP participation runs 5.6% against 15.2% nationally.
Food insecurity runs 9.3% against 17.8% nationally. Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 133 filings here across 6 tracked years. It sits 0.7 points below the Camden County average of 5.7.
The worst year on record was 2018, when 36.2% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Camden. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 26.9% of renter households face a filing.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007604700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007604700?
Census tract 34007604700 in the Fairview neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007604700?
Median gross rent is $1,988/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007604700?
7.2% of residents in tract 34007604700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,887.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007604700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 8th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 24th, household 9th, minority 6th, housing 12th.
Q5
Is tract 34007604700 considered part of Fairview?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34007604700 fall within Fairview (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007604700?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 133 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007604700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 26.86% of renter households, peaking at 36.2% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34007604700 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34007604700 compare to Gloucester City overall?
Tract 34007604700 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Gloucester City at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Gloucester City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 34007604700 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Gloucester City
Top eight tracts in Gloucester City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related