Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,578 of 84,120 nationally

Little Silver Eviction Risk: Moderate , Red Bank

Tract 34025803500 · Monmouth County, NJ · pop 2,804 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Tract 34025803500, home to 2,804 residents in the Little Silver neighborhood of Red Bank, scores 6.2/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 80% of US census tracts.

About 40% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,847 a month against an average household income of $89,224 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 42% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 25% Owners 59%
Tract context
Occupied units1,466
Renter share41.5%
SVI overall0.18
Poverty rate3.3%
Median income$89,224

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Little Silver
Very High
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Red Bank
Low
Within county
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#28 of 154 tracts In Monmouth County
High
Within state
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#775 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Red Bank and the region

Centroid at 40.3439, -74.0609 · click any tract to drill in

Why Little Silver scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Red Bank
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
3.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,847 rent vs county FMR
4.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Red Bank
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Red Bank
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Red Bank
5.3

How Little Silver compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Little Silver risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.74.7This tracttract 803500Red Bank: 7.07.0Red Bankparent cityCounty: 3.13.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.34.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 18

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 132Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 11.33%Avg annual filing rate
  • 13.7%Peak (2013)
  • 53Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Little Silver. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Little Silver

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Red Bank, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Monmouth County average of 6.3 and below the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 18th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 34025803500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34025803500?

Census tract 34025803500 in the Little Silver neighborhood scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34025803500?

Median gross rent is $1,847/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34025803500?

3.3% of residents in tract 34025803500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,804.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34025803500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 18th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 25th, household 9th, minority 33th, housing 35th.
Q5

Is tract 34025803500 considered part of Little Silver?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34025803500 fall within Little Silver (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34025803500?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 132 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 34025803500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.33% of renter households, peaking at 13.7% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 34025803500 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 34025803500 compare to Red Bank overall?

Tract 34025803500 scores 4.7/10, lower than the parent city of Red Bank at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Red Bank; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Red Bank

Top eight tracts in Red Bank ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related