Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #41,065 of 84,120 nationally

Little Silver Eviction Risk: Moderate , Red Bank

Tract 34025803602 · Monmouth County, NJ · pop 2,808 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Census tract 34025803602 covers the Little Silver area of Red Bank, home to 2,808 residents. For landlords it grades 6.1/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than roughly 77% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 36% of renter households, a high level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,875 monthly, set against $135,781 in average yearly household income, roughly 17% of income at the averages. About 35% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 22% Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units1,311
Renter share34.6%
SVI overall0.14
Poverty rate5.6%
Median income$135,781

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Little Silver
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Red Bank
Very Low
Within county
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#38 of 154 tracts In Monmouth County
High
Within state
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#949 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Red Bank and the region

Centroid at 40.3494, -74.0562 · click any tract to drill in

Why Little Silver scores 4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Red Bank
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.6% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,875 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Red Bank
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Red Bank
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Red Bank
5.3

How Little Silver compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Little Silver risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.04.0This tracttract 803602Red Bank: 7.07.0Red Bankparent cityCounty: 3.13.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.34.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 14

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Little Silver. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Little Silver

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Red Bank, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Monmouth County average of 6.3 and below the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 14th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 34025803602

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34025803602?

Census tract 34025803602 in the Little Silver neighborhood scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34025803602?

Median gross rent is $1,875/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34025803602?

5.6% of residents in tract 34025803602 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,808.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34025803602?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 14th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 17th, minority 27th, housing 21th.
Q5

Is tract 34025803602 considered part of Little Silver?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34025803602 fall within Little Silver (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 34025803602 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 34025803602 compare to Red Bank overall?

Tract 34025803602 scores 4/10, lower than the parent city of Red Bank at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Red Bank; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Red Bank

Top eight tracts in Red Bank ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related