Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #20,889 of 84,120 nationally
Red Bank Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 34025803601 · Monmouth County, NJ · pop 2,079
Census tract 34025803601 belongs to Red Bank, New Jersey. It is home to 2,079 residents and scores 6.5/10, an elevated reading for landlords. It lands near the 87th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
39% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,039 monthly, set against $81,272 in average yearly household income, roughly 30% of income at the averages. Renters make up 70% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28%
Stable renters 43%
Owners 29%
Tract context
Occupied units1,163
Renter share70.2%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate11.7%
Median income$81,272
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
87
th percentile
High
Within state
70
th percentile
Elevated
National
75
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Red Bank and the region
Centroid at 40.3505, -74.0721 · click any tract to drill in
Why Red Bank scores 5.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Red Bank
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
11.7% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$2,039 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Red Bank
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Red Bank
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Red Bank
5.3
How Red Bank compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 36
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 13%Socioeconomic
- 16%Household composition
- 35%Racial/ethnic minority
- 92%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.0%Housing insecurity
- 5.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.6%Food insecurity
- 6.7%SNAP enrollment
- 6.0%Transit barriers
- 10.0%No health insurance
- 13.3%Frequent mental distress
- 26.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Red Bank
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Red Bank, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Monmouth County average of 6.3 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 36th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 34025803601
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34025803601?
Census tract 34025803601 in Red Bank scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34025803601?
Median gross rent is $2,039/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34025803601?
11.7% of residents in tract 34025803601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,079.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34025803601?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 16th, minority 35th, housing 92th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 34025803601 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 34025803601 compare to Red Bank overall?
Tract 34025803601 scores 5.3/10, lower than the parent city of Red Bank at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Red Bank; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Red Bank
Top eight tracts in Red Bank ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related