Within parent city
67
th percentile
Elevated
Census Tract · Ranked #9,927 of 84,120 nationally
Red Bank Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 34025803400 · Monmouth County, NJ · pop 5,177
Census tract 34025803400 covers part of Red Bank, NJ, and scores 7.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,177 residents. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.1/10.
Risk score
7.6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31%
Stable renters 24%
Owners 45%
Tract context
Occupied units1,962
Renter share54.3%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate12.2%
Median income$97,429
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
87
th percentile
High
Within state
77
th percentile
High
National
88
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Red Bank and the region
Centroid at 40.3425, -74.0771 · click any tract to drill in
Why Red Bank scores 7.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Red Bank
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.2% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$2,167 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Red Bank
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Red Bank
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Red Bank
5.3
How Red Bank compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 92%Socioeconomic
- 91%Household composition
- 77%Racial/ethnic minority
- 88%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 107Total filings over 2 yrs
- 5.43%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.4%Peak (2013)
- 34Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 22.3%Housing insecurity
- 13.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 27.4%Food insecurity
- 19.2%SNAP enrollment
- 13.3%Transit barriers
- 23.7%No health insurance
- 16.7%Frequent mental distress
- 30.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Red Bank
26% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. It sits 1.9 points above the Monmouth County average of 5.7. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.5/10.
Against Monmouth County at 47.3%, 56% of renters here are cost-burdened. Adults with no health insurance runs 23.7% against 11.3% nationally. Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 107 filings here across 2 tracked years.
Housing insecurity runs 22.3% against 14.2% nationally. On the softer side, economic stress reads 3.1/10. The worst year on record was 2013, when 7.4% of renter households were served.
In a typical year about 5.4% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 88% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Social vulnerability reads 9.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 34025803400
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34025803400?
Census tract 34025803400 in Red Bank scores 7.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34025803400?
Median gross rent is $2,167/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34025803400?
12.2% of residents in tract 34025803400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,177.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34025803400?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 91th, minority 77th, housing 88th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34025803400?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 107 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 34025803400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.43% of renter households, peaking at 7.4% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 34025803400 struggle to pay rent?
About 22.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 34025803400 compare to Red Bank overall?
Tract 34025803400 scores 7.6/10, higher than the parent city of Red Bank at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Red Bank; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Red Bank
Top eight tracts in Red Bank ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related