Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,435 of 84,120 nationally

Rolling Hill Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chatham

Tract 34027043100 · Morris County, NJ · pop 3,700 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Rolling Hill in Chatham is where census tract 34027043100 sits, home to 3,700 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 6.1/10. On the national scale it ranks #19,041 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 40% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 40% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,515 a month while the average household earns $228,333 a year, roughly 13% of income at the averages. About 7% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1-10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 4% Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units1,140
Renter share7.0%
SVI overall0.11
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$228,333

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileBottomTop
#4 of 4 tracts In Rolling Hill
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileBottomTop
#4 of 4 tracts In Chatham
Very Low
Within county
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileBottomTop
#101 of 110 tracts In Morris County
Very Low
Within state
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileBottomTop
#2,098 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chatham and the region

Centroid at 40.7507, -74.4174 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rolling Hill scores 5.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chatham
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.2
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,515 rent vs county FMR
6.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chatham
5.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chatham
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chatham
4.0

How Rolling Hill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rolling Hill risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.65.6This tracttract 043100Chatham: 6.86.8Chathamparent cityCounty: 6.96.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.87.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 11

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Historic baseline (2000-2018)

  • 1Total filings over 1 yrs
  • 0.66%Avg annual filing rate
  • 0.7%Peak (2017)
  • 1Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rolling Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rolling Hill

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Chatham, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Morris County average of 5.8 and below the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 1 eviction filings here over 1 tracked years, with about 0.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 0.7% of renter households in 2017.

In CDC survey modeling, about 4.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 34027043100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34027043100?

Census tract 34027043100 in the Rolling Hill neighborhood scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34027043100?

Median gross rent is $2,515/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34027043100?

2.5% of residents in tract 34027043100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,700.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34027043100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 11th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 15th, household 30th, minority 33th, housing 12th.

Q5

Is tract 34027043100 considered part of Rolling Hill?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34027043100 fall within Rolling Hill (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).

Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34027043100?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 1 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 34027043100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.66% of renter households, peaking at 0.7% in 2017. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

Q7

What share of households in tract 34027043100 struggle to pay rent?

About 4.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

Q8

How does tract 34027043100 compare to Chatham overall?

Tract 34027043100 scores 5.6/10, lower than the parent city of Chatham at 6.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chatham; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chatham

Top eight tracts in Chatham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related