Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #72,539 of 84,120 nationally

Floral Park Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 36059404400 · Nassau County, NY · pop 5,008

Census tract 36059404400 covers Floral Park, home to 5,008 residents. For landlords it grades 5.9/10, a moderate reading. It lands near the 71st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

65% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 42% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,301 a month while the average household earns $172,045 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. Renters make up 10% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.1
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 4% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,642
Renter share10.2%
SVI overall0.07
Poverty rate2.3%
Median income$172,045

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Floral Park
Very Low
Within county
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#137 of 281 tracts In Nassau County
Moderate
Within state
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#5,053 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Very Low
National
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#72,539 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Floral Park and the region

Centroid at 40.7210, -73.7116 · click any tract to drill in

Why Floral Park scores 2.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Floral Park
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
2.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,301 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Floral Park
8.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Floral Park
3.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Floral Park
5.7

How Floral Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Floral Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.12.1This tracttract 404400Floral Park: 8.58.5Floral Parkparent cityCounty: 2.62.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.95.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 7

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Floral Park

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Floral Park, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Nassau County average of 5.5 and below the New York statewide average of 6.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 7th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 36059404400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36059404400?

Census tract 36059404400 in Floral Park scores 2.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36059404400?

Median gross rent is $2,301/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36059404400?

2.3% of residents in tract 36059404400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,008.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36059404400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 7th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 28th, minority 35th, housing 13th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 36059404400 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 36059404400 compare to Floral Park overall?

Tract 36059404400 scores 2.1/10, lower than the parent city of Floral Park at 8.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Floral Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 36059404400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Floral Park

Top eight tracts in Floral Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related