Within neighborhood
75
th percentile
High
Neighborhood · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally
Murray Hill Eviction Risk: Lower , Scarsdale
Tract 36119010702 · Westchester County, NY · pop 5,794 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Murray Hill in Scarsdale is where census tract 36119010702 sits, home to 5,794 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is $1/10. That is riskier than about 74% of US census tracts.
57% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,650 monthly, set against $118,826 in average yearly household income, roughly 27% of income at the averages. Renters make up 22% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 65% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 9%
Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units2,731
Renter share22.0%
SVI overall0.35
Poverty rate8.6%
Median income$118,826
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
34
th percentile
Low
Within state
20
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Scarsdale and the region
Centroid at 41.0037, -73.8089 · click any tract to drill in
Why Murray Hill scores 3.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Scarsdale
7.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.8
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
8.6% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$2,650 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Scarsdale
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Scarsdale
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Scarsdale
5.0
How Murray Hill compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 35
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 21%Socioeconomic
- 19%Household composition
- 58%Racial/ethnic minority
- 70%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 2%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Murray Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.9%Housing insecurity
- 4.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.4%Food insecurity
- 5.3%SNAP enrollment
- 4.4%Transit barriers
- 3.8%No health insurance
- 11.0%Frequent mental distress
- 18.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Murray Hill
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 7.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Scarsdale, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Westchester County average of 6.1 and in line with the New York statewide average of 6.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 6.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 35th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 36119010702
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36119010702?
Census tract 36119010702 in the Murray Hill neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 36119010702?
Median gross rent is $2,650/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 36119010702?
8.6% of residents in tract 36119010702 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,794.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 36119010702?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 35th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 19th, minority 58th, housing 70th.
Q5
Is tract 36119010702 considered part of Murray Hill?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36119010702 fall within Murray Hill (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 36119010702 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 36119010702 compare to Scarsdale overall?
Tract 36119010702 scores 3.7/10, lower than the parent city of Scarsdale at 8.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Scarsdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 36119010702 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Scarsdale
Top eight tracts in Scarsdale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related