Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,413 of 84,120 nationally

Crestwood Eviction Risk: High , Tuckahoe

Tract 36119002201 · Westchester County, NY · pop 2,425 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Tract 36119002201 sits in the Crestwood area of Yonkers eviction risk, NY, carrying an eviction-risk score of 8.5/10. Population here is 2,425. Cost burden runs 23% here against 47.2% across Westchester County.

Risk score
8.5
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 11% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units899
Renter share13.8%
SVI overall0.19
Poverty rate5.6%
Median income$161,406

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Crestwood
Very High
Within parent city
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#54 of 58 tracts In Tuckahoe
Very Low
Within county
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#105 of 241 tracts In Westchester County
Elevated
Within state
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#2,229 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tuckahoe and the region

Centroid at 40.9548, -73.8354 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crestwood scores 8.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tuckahoe
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.8
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
5.6% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$2,118 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tuckahoe
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tuckahoe
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tuckahoe
8.5

How Crestwood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Crestwood risk score vs. parent city / county / state8.5This tracttract 0022018.2Tuckahoeparent city7.8Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 19

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Crestwood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crestwood

The dominant input is eviction-process difficulty at 9/10. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.4/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. 13% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Average gross rent is $2,118, 19% above the Yonkers average. Food insecurity runs 8.6% against 17.8% nationally.

SNAP participation runs 6.1% against 15.2% nationally. Against the Westchester County average of 7.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.7 points.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 94% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.7/10. Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $161,406, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 36119002201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36119002201?

Census tract 36119002201 in the Crestwood neighborhood scores 8.5/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36119002201?

Median gross rent is $2,118/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36119002201?

5.6% of residents in tract 36119002201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,425.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36119002201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 19th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 13th, minority 42th, housing 50th.
Q5

Is tract 36119002201 considered part of Crestwood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36119002201 fall within Crestwood (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36119002201 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36119002201 compare to Tuckahoe overall?

Tract 36119002201 scores 8.5/10, higher than the parent city of Tuckahoe at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tuckahoe; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36119002201 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tuckahoe

Top eight tracts in Tuckahoe ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related