Skip to content
Neighborhood · Asheville, NC

Murphy Junction Eviction Risk: Moderate

2 census tracts · pop 4,372 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 5.1/10 · range 5–5.2

Murphy Junction is a white-hispanic neighborhood in Asheville with 2 census tracts and a population of 4,372 residents. The neighborhood's pop-weighted eviction-risk score of 5.1/10 (Moderate tier) blends state law, county-level filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty. 60% of renters here pay at least 30% of household income on rent, and 40% are severely cost-burdened (≥50% of income). Average gross rent of $1,018/month sits 27% lower than the Asheville citywide average ($1,402).

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
2 tracts · population-weighted
Murphy Junction vs Asheville How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
60.4% +91%
Asheville: 31.7%
Average gross rent
$1,018 -27%
Asheville: $1,402
Average HH income
$44,575 -34%
Asheville: $67,221
Poverty rate
19.4% +33%
Asheville: 14.6%
Renter share
47.5% -1%
Asheville: 48.1%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Murphy Junction and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 2 tracts span score 5–5.2

Why Murphy Junction scores 5.1

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 2.3–2.3 across tracts
2.3
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 6.1–6.1 across tracts
6.1
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 7.5–7.5 across tracts
7.5
Rent control risk
60% of income on rent · Range 2.5–2.5 across tracts
2.5
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 4.0–4.0 across tracts
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
48% renter households · Range 6.5–6.5 across tracts
6.5
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 4.0–4.0 across tracts
4.0
Economic stress
19.4% below poverty line · Range 4.2–6.3 across tracts
4.8
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 1.4–1.9 across tracts
1.7
Risk score comparison

Murphy Junction vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Murphy Junction score vs. parent city, state, U.S.Murphy Junction: 5.15.1Murphy JunctionNeighborhoodParent city: 3.43.4Parent cityhost cityState: 2.92.9Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

2 tracts in Murphy Junction

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
37021000200 5.2 1,352 65% $974
37021001402 5 3,020 58% $1,038
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 76

Pop-weighted across 2 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 76%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 74%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 63%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 57%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history in Murphy Junction

Aggregated across 1 validated constituent tract. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households, pop-weighted.

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 924Total filings (sum)
  • 23.28%Avg annual filing rate
  • 63.3%Peak year (2008)
  • 31.20%Latest filed (2013)
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Murphy Junction

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Murphy Junction

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Murphy Junction?

Murphy Junction scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier) across 2 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Murphy Junction compare to Asheville overall?

Murphy Junction scores 1.7 points higher than Asheville overall (3.4/10). Renters spend 60% of income on rent vs 32% citywide. Average rent: $1,018 vs $1,402.
Q3

What is the average rent in Murphy Junction?

Average gross rent in Murphy Junction is $1,018/month (pop-weighted across 2 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Murphy Junction residents are renters?

48% of Murphy Junction households are renter-occupied (vs 48% in Asheville). The neighborhood has 4,372 residents.
Q5

Is Murphy Junction a high social-vulnerability area?

Murphy Junction sits in the 76th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (highly vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

Which tracts in Murphy Junction have the highest eviction risk?

The highest-risk constituent tract in Murphy Junction is census tract 37021000200 (score 5.2/10). Across the 2 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 5 to 5.2, a spread of 0.2 points.
Q7

How safe is Murphy Junction for landlords?

Murphy Junction carries a moderate-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (5.1/10). Pop-weighted across 2 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Asheville as a whole (3.4/10), this neighborhood is higher-risk.
Q8

What is the demographic breakdown of Murphy Junction?

Murphy Junction has 4,987 residents (White-Hispanic Neighborhood). Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (52.2%), Hispanic / Latino (28.4%), Black (non-Hispanic) (13.4%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Murphy Junction

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Asheville

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Murphy Junction.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further