Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally
Konnoak Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Winston-Salem
Tract 37067002002 · Forsyth County, NC · pop 4,186 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Tract 37067002002 sits in the Konnoak Village area of Winston-Salem eviction risk, NC, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5/10. Population here is 4,186. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.5/10.
Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22%
Stable renters 39%
Owners 39%
Tract context
Occupied units1,582
Renter share60.7%
SVI overall0.92
Poverty rate22.0%
Median income$40,714
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
77
th percentile
High
Within county
81
th percentile
High
Within state
80
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Winston-Salem and the region
Centroid at 36.0514, -80.2488 · click any tract to drill in
Why Konnoak Village scores 5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Winston-Salem
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
22.0% poverty · this tract
5.5
Supply constraint
$797 rent vs county FMR
1.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Winston-Salem
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Winston-Salem
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Winston-Salem
3.5
How Konnoak Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 92
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 94%Socioeconomic
- 97%Household composition
- 85%Racial/ethnic minority
- 49%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 659Total filings over 4 yrs
- 43.84%Avg annual filing rate
- 55.6%Peak (2010)
- 75Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 57% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 23.6%Housing insecurity
- 16.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 32.2%Food insecurity
- 29.5%SNAP enrollment
- 16.2%Transit barriers
- 22.1%No health insurance
- 19.2%Frequent mental distress
- 42.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Konnoak Village
Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. At $797 a month, rents run 27% under what the rest of Winston-Salem commands.
Food insecurity runs 32.2% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 29.5% against 15.2% nationally. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.9/10.
The poverty rate is 22%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Against the Forsyth County average of 3.9, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.1 points. The filing record is not thin: 659 evictions over 4 years of observation.
37% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Forsyth County average of 41.1%. The worst year on record was 2010, when 55.6% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 43.8% of renter households face a filing.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 37067002002
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37067002002?
Census tract 37067002002 in the Konnoak Village neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 37067002002?
Median gross rent is $797/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 37067002002?
22.0% of residents in tract 37067002002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,186.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 37067002002?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 92th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 94th, household 97th, minority 85th, housing 49th.
Q5
Is tract 37067002002 considered part of Konnoak Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37067002002 fall within Konnoak Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37067002002?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 659 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 37067002002 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 43.84% of renter households, peaking at 55.6% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 37067002002 struggle to pay rent?
About 23.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 37067002002 compare to Winston-Salem overall?
Tract 37067002002 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Winston-Salem at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Winston-Salem eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 37067002002 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Winston-Salem
Top eight tracts in Winston-Salem ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NC
Autumn Oaks
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Autumn Oaks
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Greenhaven
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
37067001400
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
37067001500
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
West End
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Tower Gate
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
West End
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Related