Skip to content
Thompson, North Dakota eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,138 residents

Thompson, ND Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Grand Forks County · Population 1,138

In 2026
Risk score
1.8
VERY LOW

63th percentile, North Dakota.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.8 Average2.6 Now1.8
3.3 1.8 1976 · score 2.6 1977 · score 2.6 1978 · score 2.6 1979 · score 2.6 1980 · score 2.6 1981 · score 2.6 1982 · score 2.5 1983 · score 2.7 1984 · score 2.6 1985 · score 2.5 1986 · score 2.5 1987 · score 2.4 1988 · score 2.7 1989 · score 2.7 1990 · score 2.8 1991 · score 2.8 1992 · score 2.8 1993 · score 2.8 1994 · score 2.8 1995 · score 2.8 1996 · score 3.0 1997 · score 3.0 1998 · score 3.1 1999 · score 3.1 2000 · score 3.0 2001 · score 3.0 2002 · score 3.0 2003 · score 2.9 2004 · score 2.8 2005 · score 2.4 2006 · score 2.3 2007 · score 2.2 2008 · score 2.9 2009 · score 2.8 2010 · score 2.8 2011 · score 2.8 2012 · score 2.7 2013 · score 2.6 2014 · score 2.6 2015 · score 2.5 2016 · score 2.5 2017 · score 2.4 2018 · score 2.3 2019 · score 2.3 2020 · score 3.1 2021 · score 3.3 2022 · score 2.3 2023 · score 2.0 2024 · score 1.9 2025 · score 1.8 2026 · score 1.8

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.4 Regional 4.4 State 1.5 Economic 2.4 Supply 2.5 Rent Control 4.7 Eviction 1.6 Tenant 2.6 Housing 3.3 1.8 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +18.2% (2024)
    4.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.4
  3. State political climate
    North Dakota legislature & governorship
    1.5
  4. Economic stress
    1.0% poverty · 0.2% unemp.
    2.4
  5. Supply constraint
    $775 average · 6.1% renters
    2.5
  6. Rent Control risk
    38.3% of income on rent
    4.7
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    19 days filing → judgment
    1.6
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    6.1% renters
    2.6
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across Thompson and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Thompson compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Grand Forks County
Moderate
#6 of 10 cities
Rank in county, 44th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 10 cities in Grand Forks County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in North Dakota
Moderate
#204 of 406 cities
Rank in state, 50th percentileLowHigh
#204 of 406 cities in North Dakota for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Thompson risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Thompson: 1.81.8ThompsonThis cityCounty: 1.81.8Countyavg in countyState: 1.81.8Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 1.8
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 1.8/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.8 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 19d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $775/mo. A contested eviction takes 19 days and costs $736–$2,310 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 6.1%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,138 residents, 6.1% rent. 38% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 1.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.4 and 4.4 (GOP margin +18.2% (2024)). State climate at 1.5, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.6, housing court bias 3.3, rent-control risk 4.7. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.4 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 2.4
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 2.4. Supply constraint: 2.5. The numbers behind those: 1.0% poverty, 0.2% unemployment, 38% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Thompson sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
00Overview

About eviction risk in Thompson, ND

Landlording in Thompson, North Dakota, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 1.8/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Thompson is a city of 1,138 residents where 6.1% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 38.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $775/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Thompson eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Thompson closes 19 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Thompson's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Thompson runs $736 to $2,310 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 19 days of typical timeline and $775/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.6/10 in Thompson, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4.7/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In North Dakota, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Thompson: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match North Dakota's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,310 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Thompson

Trap · 4.7/10
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. Thompson's 2.3/10 is below the North Dakota state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 4.7/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant refuses to leave after the judge grants me possession?

If the judge grants you possession and the tenant still won't leave, you'll need to get a writ of restitution from the court. You then take this to the Traill County Sheriff's office, and they will schedule a time to physically remove the tenant and their belongings. Do not try to remove them yourself; that's illegal self-help eviction.

Q2

Can I charge a late fee in Thompson, ND?

Yes, you can charge a reasonable late fee if it's clearly stated in your lease agreement. There's no specific state cap on late fees, but they must be reasonable and reflect your actual damages from late payment. Don't try to make a profit off late fees.

Q3

Is there rent control in Thompson or North Dakota?

No, there is no rent control in Thompson or anywhere in North Dakota. Landlords are generally free to set and raise rents as they see fit, provided they give proper notice for rent increases (typically 30 days for month-to-month tenancies). You can learn more on our North Dakota rent control rules page.

Q4

Can I evict a tenant for having a pet if my lease says "no pets"?

Yes, if your lease clearly prohibits pets and the tenant brings one in, that's a lease violation. You would typically serve a notice to cure or quit, giving them a chance to remove the pet. If they don't, you can proceed with an eviction based on the lease violation. Always be mindful of service animals, which are protected by federal law.

Q5

What's the biggest mistake landlords make in Thompson?

The biggest mistake is delaying action. When rent isn't paid, or a lease is violated, waiting "just a few more days" quickly turns into weeks. This costs you money and sends the wrong message. Follow the process, serve notices promptly, and don't be afraid to go to court if necessary. Another common mistake is not having a clear, written lease agreement.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 1.8/10 places Thompson in the 63rd percentile of North Dakota cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.