Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #77,226 of 84,120 nationally

Raider’s Run Eviction Risk: Lower , Kenwood

Tract 39061024002 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 3,144 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Tract 39061024002 covers the Raider's Run neighborhood of Kenwood in Ohio. Home to 3,144 residents, it scores 6.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 80% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

76% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 49% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,942 a month against an average household income of $106,705 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 22% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 5% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,256
Renter share22.5%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$106,705

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Raider’s Run
Very High
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Kenwood
Very Low
Within county
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#202 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Very Low
Within state
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#2,870 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kenwood and the region

Centroid at 39.2127, -84.3682 · click any tract to drill in

Why Raider’s Run scores 1.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kenwood
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,942 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kenwood
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kenwood
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kenwood
5.8

How Raider’s Run compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Raider’s Run risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.71.7This tracttract 024002Kenwood: 2.92.9Kenwoodparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 41

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 40Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 0.81%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.2%Peak (2005)
  • 1Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610240022002: 3 filings (0.73/100 renter HHs)2003: 2 filings (0.49/100 renter HHs)2004: 5 filings (1.22/100 renter HHs)2005: 9 filings (2.22/100 renter HHs)2006: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2007: 2 filings (0.49/100 renter HHs)2008: 2 filings (0.49/100 renter HHs)2009: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2010: 5 filings (1.47/100 renter HHs)2011: 1 filings (0.28/100 renter HHs)2012: 2 filings (0.56/100 renter HHs)2013: 2 filings (0.56/100 renter HHs)2014: 4 filings (1.12/100 renter HHs)2015: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2016: 2 filings (0.55/100 renter HHs)2018: 1 filings (0.28/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 67% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 27Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 2.50×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (5.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (5.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Raider’s Run. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Raider’s Run

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Kenwood, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 40 eviction filings here over 13 tracked years, with about 0.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 2.2% of renter households in 2005.

In CDC survey modeling, about 5.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061024002

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061024002?

Census tract 39061024002 in the Raider’s Run neighborhood scores 1.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061024002?

Median gross rent is $1,942/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 76% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061024002?

2.5% of residents in tract 39061024002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,144.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061024002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 28th, household 49th, minority 35th, housing 61th.
Q5

Is tract 39061024002 considered part of Raider’s Run?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061024002 fall within Raider’s Run (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061024002?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 40 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 39061024002 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.81% of renter households, peaking at 2.2% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061024002 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 2.50× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061024002 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061024002 compare to Kenwood overall?

Tract 39061024002 scores 1.7/10, lower than the parent city of Kenwood at 2.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kenwood; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Kenwood

Top eight tracts in Kenwood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related