Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,878 of 84,120 nationally

Mount Airy Eviction Risk: Elevated , Cincinnati

Tract 39061008501 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 3,094 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

How risky is the Mount Airy neighborhood of Cincinnati for landlords? Census tract 39061008501 scores 6.4/10, the Elevated tier. It lands near the 84th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 63% of renter households, a severe level, and 51% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $795 a month against an average household income of $23,253 a year, roughly 41% of income at the averages. Renters make up 74% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.2
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 46% Stable renters 27% Owners 27%
Tract context
Occupied units1,464
Renter share73.6%
SVI overall0.98
Poverty rate38.5%
Median income$23,253

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In Mount Airy
Very High
Within parent city
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 110 tracts In Cincinnati
Very High
Within county
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Very High
Within state
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#21 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cincinnati and the region

Centroid at 39.1739, -84.5665 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mount Airy scores 6.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cincinnati
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
38.5% poverty · this tract
9.6
Supply constraint
$795 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cincinnati
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cincinnati
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cincinnati
4.5

How Mount Airy compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mount Airy risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.26.2This tracttract 008501Cincinnati: 3.43.4Cincinnatiparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 98

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 5,290Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 27.23%Avg annual filing rate
  • 36.5%Peak (2005)
  • 185Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610085012002: 329 filings (24.55/100 renter HHs)2003: 288 filings (21.49/100 renter HHs)2004: 410 filings (30.60/100 renter HHs)2005: 500 filings (36.52/100 renter HHs)2006: 455 filings (33.24/100 renter HHs)2007: 382 filings (27.90/100 renter HHs)2008: 332 filings (24.25/100 renter HHs)2009: 273 filings (19.94/100 renter HHs)2010: 261 filings (22.79/100 renter HHs)2011: 328 filings (30.20/100 renter HHs)2012: 253 filings (23.30/100 renter HHs)2013: 289 filings (26.61/100 renter HHs)2014: 345 filings (31.77/100 renter HHs)2015: 381 filings (35.08/100 renter HHs)2016: 279 filings (28.53/100 renter HHs)2018: 185 filings (18.92/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 44% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 2,235Total filings 2020-21
  • 29.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 23.7Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.23×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 13 filings (0.46× baseline)2020-06-01: 3 filings (0.19× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 11 filings (0.41× baseline)2020-09-01: 8 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-10-01: 13 filings (0.69× baseline)2020-11-01: 24 filings (0.72× baseline)2020-12-01: 30 filings (0.94× baseline)2021-01-01: 11 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-02-01: 23 filings (1.11× baseline)2021-03-01: 9 filings (0.46× baseline)2021-04-01: 24 filings (1.24× baseline)2021-05-01: 36 filings (1.27× baseline)2021-06-01: 41 filings (2.53× baseline)2021-07-01: 20 filings (0.56× baseline)2021-08-01: 47 filings (1.74× baseline)2021-09-01: 32 filings (1.26× baseline)2021-10-01: 33 filings (1.76× baseline)2021-11-01: 22 filings (0.66× baseline)2021-12-01: 44 filings (1.38× baseline)2022-01-01: 26 filings (0.95× baseline)2022-02-01: 25 filings (1.20× baseline)2022-03-01: 39 filings (1.99× baseline)2022-04-01: 31 filings (1.60× baseline)2022-05-01: 32 filings (1.13× baseline)2022-06-01: 34 filings (2.10× baseline)2022-07-01: 19 filings (0.53× baseline)2022-08-01: 49 filings (1.81× baseline)2022-09-01: 31 filings (1.22× baseline)2022-10-01: 31 filings (1.65× baseline)2022-11-01: 62 filings (1.87× baseline)2022-12-01: 62 filings (1.95× baseline)2023-01-01: 38 filings (1.39× baseline)2023-02-01: 52 filings (2.50× baseline)2023-03-01: 27 filings (1.38× baseline)2023-04-01: 20 filings (1.03× baseline)2023-05-01: 40 filings (1.41× baseline)2023-06-01: 37 filings (2.28× baseline)2023-07-01: 6 filings (0.17× baseline)2023-08-01: 106 filings (3.93× baseline)2023-09-01: 9 filings (0.35× baseline)2023-10-01: 56 filings (2.98× baseline)2023-11-01: 18 filings (0.54× baseline)2023-12-01: 54 filings (1.70× baseline)2024-01-01: 49 filings (1.79× baseline)2024-02-01: 77 filings (3.70× baseline)2024-03-01: 31 filings (1.58× baseline)2024-04-01: 54 filings (2.78× baseline)2024-05-01: 51 filings (1.80× baseline)2024-06-01: 41 filings (2.53× baseline)2024-07-01: 16 filings (0.45× baseline)2024-08-01: 32 filings (1.19× baseline)2024-09-01: 34 filings (1.34× baseline)2024-10-01: 63 filings (3.35× baseline)2024-11-01: 42 filings (1.27× baseline)2024-12-01: 20 filings (0.63× baseline)2025-01-01: 29 filings (1.06× baseline)2025-02-01: 20 filings (0.96× baseline)2025-03-01: 31 filings (1.58× baseline)2025-04-01: 15 filings (0.77× baseline)2025-05-01: 25 filings (0.88× baseline)2025-06-01: 11 filings (0.68× baseline)2025-07-01: 40 filings (1.12× baseline)2025-08-01: 29 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-09-01: 20 filings (0.79× baseline)2025-10-01: 19 filings (1.01× baseline)2025-11-01: 9 filings (0.27× baseline)2025-12-01: 31 filings (0.97× baseline)2026-01-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Mount Airy. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mount Airy

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 9.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 33.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 28.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.23x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, roughly back to the pre-pandemic baseline.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061008501

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061008501?

Census tract 39061008501 in the Mount Airy neighborhood scores 6.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061008501?

Median gross rent is $795/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061008501?

38.5% of residents in tract 39061008501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,094.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061008501?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 98th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 94th, household 96th, minority 85th, housing 90th.
Q5

Is tract 39061008501 considered part of Mount Airy?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061008501 fall within Mount Airy (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061008501?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 5,290 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061008501 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 27.23% of renter households, peaking at 36.5% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061008501 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.23× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061008501 struggle to pay rent?

About 33.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 28.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061008501 compare to Cincinnati overall?

Tract 39061008501 scores 6.2/10, higher than the parent city of Cincinnati at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cincinnati

Top eight tracts in Cincinnati ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related