Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #10,885 of 84,120 nationally

Mount Airy Eviction Risk: Elevated , Cincinnati

Tract 39061008300 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 4,854 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 39061008300 (Mount Airy in Cincinnati, Ohio) comes in at 6.1/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than about 77% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 88% of renter households, a severe level, and 52% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $797 a month against an average household income of $31,100 a year, roughly 31% of income at the averages. Renters make up 55% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.1
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 48% Stable renters 7% Owners 45%
Tract context
Occupied units2,229
Renter share55.3%
SVI overall0.80
Poverty rate28.5%
Median income$31,100

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 5 tracts In Mount Airy
High
Within parent city
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#17 of 110 tracts In Cincinnati
High
Within county
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Very High
Within state
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#58 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cincinnati and the region

Centroid at 39.1990, -84.5736 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mount Airy scores 6.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cincinnati
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
28.5% poverty · this tract
7.1
Supply constraint
$797 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cincinnati
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cincinnati
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cincinnati
4.5

How Mount Airy compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mount Airy risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.16.1This tracttract 008300Cincinnati: 3.43.4Cincinnatiparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 80

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,967Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 18.95%Avg annual filing rate
  • 27.5%Peak (2014)
  • 167Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610083002002: 126 filings (13.22/100 renter HHs)2003: 141 filings (14.80/100 renter HHs)2004: 157 filings (16.47/100 renter HHs)2005: 192 filings (19.34/100 renter HHs)2006: 220 filings (22.16/100 renter HHs)2007: 239 filings (24.07/100 renter HHs)2008: 199 filings (20.04/100 renter HHs)2009: 161 filings (16.21/100 renter HHs)2010: 196 filings (19.92/100 renter HHs)2011: 193 filings (21.16/100 renter HHs)2012: 173 filings (18.97/100 renter HHs)2013: 193 filings (21.16/100 renter HHs)2014: 251 filings (27.52/100 renter HHs)2015: 177 filings (19.41/100 renter HHs)2016: 182 filings (14.99/100 renter HHs)2018: 167 filings (13.76/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 33% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 704Total filings 2020-21
  • 9.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 15.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.60×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 7 filings (0.56× baseline)2020-07-01: 9 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (0.26× baseline)2020-09-01: 7 filings (0.29× baseline)2020-10-01: 3 filings (0.14× baseline)2020-11-01: 8 filings (0.63× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (0.22× baseline)2021-01-01: 14 filings (0.82× baseline)2021-02-01: 7 filings (0.54× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 4 filings (0.28× baseline)2021-05-01: 4 filings (0.26× baseline)2021-06-01: 5 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-07-01: 11 filings (0.49× baseline)2021-08-01: 15 filings (0.96× baseline)2021-09-01: 10 filings (0.42× baseline)2021-10-01: 7 filings (0.32× baseline)2021-11-01: 7 filings (0.55× baseline)2021-12-01: 6 filings (0.32× baseline)2022-01-01: 8 filings (0.47× baseline)2022-02-01: 9 filings (0.69× baseline)2022-03-01: 12 filings (1.36× baseline)2022-04-01: 13 filings (0.92× baseline)2022-05-01: 15 filings (0.97× baseline)2022-06-01: 11 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-07-01: 17 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-08-01: 13 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-09-01: 16 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-10-01: 15 filings (0.69× baseline)2022-11-01: 8 filings (0.63× baseline)2022-12-01: 12 filings (0.65× baseline)2023-01-01: 16 filings (0.94× baseline)2023-02-01: 14 filings (1.08× baseline)2023-03-01: 9 filings (1.02× baseline)2023-04-01: 11 filings (0.77× baseline)2023-05-01: 9 filings (0.58× baseline)2023-06-01: 12 filings (0.97× baseline)2023-07-01: 12 filings (0.53× baseline)2023-08-01: 9 filings (0.58× baseline)2023-09-01: 14 filings (0.59× baseline)2023-10-01: 6 filings (0.28× baseline)2023-11-01: 10 filings (0.78× baseline)2023-12-01: 13 filings (0.70× baseline)2024-01-01: 11 filings (0.65× baseline)2024-02-01: 15 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-03-01: 8 filings (0.91× baseline)2024-04-01: 16 filings (1.13× baseline)2024-05-01: 11 filings (0.71× baseline)2024-06-01: 10 filings (0.81× baseline)2024-07-01: 14 filings (0.62× baseline)2024-08-01: 8 filings (0.51× baseline)2024-09-01: 14 filings (0.59× baseline)2024-10-01: 12 filings (0.55× baseline)2024-11-01: 6 filings (0.47× baseline)2024-12-01: 15 filings (0.81× baseline)2025-01-01: 14 filings (0.82× baseline)2025-02-01: 12 filings (0.92× baseline)2025-03-01: 4 filings (0.45× baseline)2025-04-01: 9 filings (0.63× baseline)2025-05-01: 11 filings (0.71× baseline)2025-06-01: 7 filings (0.56× baseline)2025-07-01: 14 filings (0.62× baseline)2025-08-01: 8 filings (0.51× baseline)2025-09-01: 13 filings (0.55× baseline)2025-10-01: 11 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 8 filings (0.63× baseline)2025-12-01: 11 filings (0.59× baseline)2026-01-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Mount Airy. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mount Airy

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 7.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 21.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 17.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.60x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061008300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061008300?

Census tract 39061008300 in the Mount Airy neighborhood scores 6.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061008300?

Median gross rent is $797/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 88% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061008300?

28.5% of residents in tract 39061008300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,854.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061008300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 80th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 84th, minority 80th, housing 47th.
Q5

Is tract 39061008300 considered part of Mount Airy?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061008300 fall within Mount Airy (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061008300?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,967 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061008300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 18.95% of renter households, peaking at 27.5% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061008300 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.60× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061008300 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061008300 compare to Cincinnati overall?

Tract 39061008300 scores 6.1/10, higher than the parent city of Cincinnati at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cincinnati

Top eight tracts in Cincinnati ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related