Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #54,934 of 84,120 nationally

Forest Park Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 39061021506 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 3,666 · 93% of tract blocks fall in Forest Park

Tract 39061021506 covers Forest Park in Ohio. Home to 3,666 residents, it scores 5.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 71st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 54% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 6% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,291 a month while the average household earns $64,144 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 32% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 15% Owners 68%
Tract context
Occupied units1,314
Renter share32.1%
SVI overall0.73
Poverty rate10.4%
Median income$64,144

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 5 tracts In Forest Park
Moderate
Within county
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#141 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Low
Within state
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#1,808 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Moderate
National
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#54,934 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Forest Park and the region

Centroid at 39.2962, -84.5151 · click any tract to drill in

Why Forest Park scores 3.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Forest Park
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
10.4% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$1,291 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Forest Park
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Forest Park
8.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Forest Park
5.1

How Forest Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Forest Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.23.2This tracttract 021506Forest Park: 2.52.5Forest Parkparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 73

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 499Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 12.44%Avg annual filing rate
  • 24.2%Peak (2004)
  • 24Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610215062002: 33 filings (18.13/100 renter HHs)2003: 37 filings (20.33/100 renter HHs)2004: 44 filings (24.18/100 renter HHs)2005: 30 filings (13.04/100 renter HHs)2006: 33 filings (14.35/100 renter HHs)2007: 29 filings (12.61/100 renter HHs)2008: 39 filings (16.96/100 renter HHs)2009: 27 filings (11.74/100 renter HHs)2010: 31 filings (12.35/100 renter HHs)2011: 27 filings (7.94/100 renter HHs)2012: 28 filings (8.24/100 renter HHs)2013: 33 filings (9.71/100 renter HHs)2014: 33 filings (9.71/100 renter HHs)2015: 20 filings (5.88/100 renter HHs)2016: 31 filings (7.81/100 renter HHs)2018: 24 filings (6.05/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 27% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 292Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.69×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (1.39× baseline)2020-09-01: 5 filings (1.92× baseline)2020-10-01: 4 filings (1.43× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.71× baseline)2020-12-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 4 filings (1.43× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (1.11× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.77× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.77× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 4 filings (1.54× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (1.43× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 6 filings (2.14× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-04-01: 5 filings (3.13× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.77× baseline)2022-07-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-08-01: 4 filings (1.11× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (0.77× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-11-01: 5 filings (3.57× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 6 filings (2.14× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 5 filings (2.78× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (2.31× baseline)2023-06-01: 6 filings (2.31× baseline)2023-07-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 5 filings (1.39× baseline)2023-09-01: 8 filings (3.08× baseline)2023-10-01: 6 filings (2.14× baseline)2023-11-01: 7 filings (5.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 11 filings (3.67× baseline)2024-01-01: 9 filings (3.21× baseline)2024-02-01: 7 filings (3.50× baseline)2024-03-01: 6 filings (3.33× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-05-01: 7 filings (2.69× baseline)2024-06-01: 11 filings (4.23× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-08-01: 6 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-09-01: 8 filings (3.08× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (1.43× baseline)2024-11-01: 8 filings (5.71× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-01-01: 7 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-02-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2025-04-01: 6 filings (3.75× baseline)2025-05-01: 6 filings (2.31× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (1.15× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 7 filings (1.94× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (1.15× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-11-01: 8 filings (5.71× baseline)2025-12-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Forest Park

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Forest Park, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 16.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 11.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 73rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061021506

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061021506?

Census tract 39061021506 in Forest Park scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061021506?

Median gross rent is $1,291/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061021506?

10.4% of residents in tract 39061021506 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,666.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061021506?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 73th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 54th, household 83th, minority 84th, housing 66th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061021506?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 499 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061021506 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 12.44% of renter households, peaking at 24.2% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 39061021506 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.69× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 39061021506 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 39061021506 compare to Forest Park overall?

Tract 39061021506 scores 3.2/10, higher than the parent city of Forest Park at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Forest Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Forest Park

Top eight tracts in Forest Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related