Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #80,791 of 84,120 nationally

Raider’s Run Eviction Risk: Lower , Kenwood

Tract 39061023902 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 5,243 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

In the Raider's Run area of Kenwood, census tract 39061023902 scores 4.7/10 for eviction risk. It lands near the 28th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 23% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 8% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,820 a month against an average household income of $139,867 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. Renters make up 12% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 9% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,963
Renter share12.0%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate4.5%
Median income$139,867

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Raider’s Run
Very Low
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Kenwood
Moderate
Within county
5 th percentile
Rank, 5th percentileLowHigh
#215 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Very Low
Within state
5 th percentile
Rank, 5th percentileLowHigh
#3,016 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kenwood and the region

Centroid at 39.2374, -84.3607 · click any tract to drill in

Why Raider’s Run scores 1.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kenwood
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
4.5% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$1,820 rent vs county FMR
9.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kenwood
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kenwood
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kenwood
3.3

How Raider’s Run compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Raider’s Run risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.31.3This tracttract 023902Kenwood: 2.92.9Kenwoodparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 9

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 33Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 1.05%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.1%Peak (2018)
  • 5Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610239022002: 1 filings (0.85/100 renter HHs)2003: 3 filings (2.56/100 renter HHs)2004: 1 filings (0.85/100 renter HHs)2005: 2 filings (0.81/100 renter HHs)2006: 2 filings (0.81/100 renter HHs)2007: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2008: 2 filings (0.81/100 renter HHs)2009: 4 filings (1.62/100 renter HHs)2010: 3 filings (1.14/100 renter HHs)2011: 1 filings (0.42/100 renter HHs)2012: 1 filings (0.42/100 renter HHs)2013: 3 filings (1.27/100 renter HHs)2014: 1 filings (0.42/100 renter HHs)2015: 2 filings (0.85/100 renter HHs)2016: 2 filings (0.83/100 renter HHs)2018: 5 filings (2.07/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 400% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 56Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 5.19×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 3 filings (15.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (7.50× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 4 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (15.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (7.50× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Raider’s Run. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Raider’s Run

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 9.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Kenwood, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and below the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 9th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 4.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061023902

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061023902?

Census tract 39061023902 in the Raider’s Run neighborhood scores 1.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061023902?

Median gross rent is $1,820/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061023902?

4.5% of residents in tract 39061023902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,243.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061023902?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 28th, minority 25th, housing 25th.
Q5

Is tract 39061023902 considered part of Raider’s Run?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061023902 fall within Raider’s Run (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061023902?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 33 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 39061023902 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.05% of renter households, peaking at 2.1% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061023902 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 5.19× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061023902 struggle to pay rent?

About 4.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061023902 compare to Kenwood overall?

Tract 39061023902 scores 1.3/10, lower than the parent city of Kenwood at 2.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kenwood; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Kenwood

Top eight tracts in Kenwood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related