Census Tract · Ranked #20,506 of 84,120 nationally
Fort McKinley Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 39113080100 ·
Montgomery County, OH · pop 6,659 · 70% of tract blocks fall in Fort McKinley
With a score of 5.8/10, tract 39113080100 in Fort McKinley, OH reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. The dominant input is housing-court posture at 8.3/10.
Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 34%Stable renters 30%Owners 36%
Tract context
Occupied units2,734
Renter share63.7%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate20.9%
Median income$45,563
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Fort McKinley
Moderate
Within county
98th percentile
#4 of 156 tracts In Montgomery County
Very High
Within state
91th percentile
#295 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very High
National
76th percentile
#20,506 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fort McKinley and the region
Centroid at 39.8107, -84.2453 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fort McKinley scores 5.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fort McKinley
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
20.9% poverty · this tract
5.2
Supply constraint
$922 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort McKinley
7.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort McKinley
8.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort McKinley
8.3
How Fort McKinley compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 88
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
83%Socioeconomic
35%Household composition
86%Racial/ethnic minority
98%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
21.9%Housing insecurity
17.7%Utility-shutoff threat
27.6%Food insecurity
27.5%SNAP enrollment
14.3%Transit barriers
9.4%No health insurance
19.2%Frequent mental distress
38.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fort McKinley
Against Montgomery County at 42.9%, 54% of renters here are cost-burdened. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.1/10. It sits 1.6 points above the Montgomery County average of 4.2.
The severe-burden share is 18%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. SNAP participation runs 27.5% against 15.2% nationally.
Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.8/10. The poverty rate is 21%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
Food insecurity runs 27.6% against 17.8% nationally. Court records carry 3,107 eviction filings across 17 observed years. At $922 a month, rents run 12% under what the rest of Fort McKinley commands.
The worst year on record was 2009, when 15.0% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Dayton. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 11.6% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 76th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 39113080100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39113080100?
Census tract 39113080100 in Fort McKinley scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39113080100?
Median gross rent is $922/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39113080100?
20.9% of residents in tract 39113080100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,659.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39113080100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 35th, minority 86th, housing 98th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39113080100?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 3,107 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 39113080100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.59% of renter households, peaking at 15.0% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 39113080100 struggle to pay rent?
About 21.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 39113080100 compare to Fort McKinley overall?
Tract 39113080100 scores 5.8/10, higher than the parent city of Fort McKinley at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort McKinley; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 39113080100 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.