Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #18,163 of 84,120 nationally

Sixth Street Historic District Eviction Risk: Elevated , Portsmouth

Tract 39145003600 · Scioto County, OH · pop 2,013 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 39145003600 covers part of the Sixth Street Historic District area of Portsmouth, OH, and scores 6/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,013. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.3/10.

Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32% Stable renters 49% Owners 19%
Tract context
Occupied units847
Renter share80.4%
SVI overall0.76
Poverty rate30.0%
Median income$21,580

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Sixth Street Historic District
Very High
Within parent city
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#3 of 8 tracts In Portsmouth
Elevated
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 21 tracts In Scioto County
High
Within state
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#47 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Portsmouth and the region

Centroid at 38.7344, -82.9976 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sixth Street Historic District scores 6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Portsmouth
3.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.9
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
30.0% poverty · this tract
7.5
Supply constraint
$603 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portsmouth
7.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portsmouth
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portsmouth
8.5

How Sixth Street Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sixth Street Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.06.0This tracttract 003600Portsmouth: 4.64.6Portsmouthparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.24.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 76

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 361Total filings over 12 yrs
  • 3.33%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.6%Peak (2003)
  • 38Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 391450036002002: 24 filings (2.42/100 renter HHs)2003: 45 filings (4.55/100 renter HHs)2004: 27 filings (2.73/100 renter HHs)2005: 30 filings (3.16/100 renter HHs)2006: 23 filings (2.42/100 renter HHs)2007: 15 filings (1.58/100 renter HHs)2008: 34 filings (3.58/100 renter HHs)2009: 35 filings (3.69/100 renter HHs)2010: 27 filings (3.05/100 renter HHs)2011: 28 filings (3.55/100 renter HHs)2012: 35 filings (4.44/100 renter HHs)2013: 38 filings (4.82/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 58% over the past 12 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Sixth Street Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sixth Street Historic District

80% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Annualized rent equals 34% of average household income of $21,580, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

Sitting well above the midpoint, housing-court posture reads 8.5/10. The poverty rate is 30%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Against the Scioto County average of 4.3, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.7 points.

Severe burden reaches 18%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.8/10.

Disability prevalence runs 44.3% against 31.5% nationally. SNAP participation runs 26.2% against 15.2% nationally.

At $603 a month, rents run 19% under what the rest of Portsmouth commands. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 361 filings here across 12 tracked years.

39% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Scioto County average of 43.7%. The worst year on record was 2003, when 4.6% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 39145003600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39145003600?

Census tract 39145003600 in the Sixth Street Historic District neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39145003600?

Median gross rent is $603/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39145003600?

30.0% of residents in tract 39145003600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,013.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39145003600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 76th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 94th, household 31th, minority 20th, housing 74th.
Q5

Is tract 39145003600 considered part of Sixth Street Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39145003600 fall within Sixth Street Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39145003600?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 361 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 39145003600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.33% of renter households, peaking at 4.6% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 39145003600 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 39145003600 compare to Portsmouth overall?

Tract 39145003600 scores 6/10, higher than the parent city of Portsmouth at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portsmouth; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 39145003600 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 33% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Portsmouth

Top eight tracts in Portsmouth ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related