Skip to content
Neighborhood · Newton Falls, OH

Rose Park Eviction Risk: Moderate

1 census tracts · pop 4,705 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 4.1/10 · range 4.1–4.1

Rose Park maps to a single census tract in Newton Falls, OH, population 4,705. Scored across those inputs it reaches 4.1/10, placing it in the Moderate tier. Cost burden runs 46% against 29.3% citywide, putting Rose Park 16.9% over its own city.

What pushes the score up most is tenant-organizing strength at 8.9/10. The severe-burden share is 17%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay.

Running cool is eviction-process difficulty, at 2.4/10. Court records for this tract carry 29 eviction filings. Filing activity peaked in 2016 at 3.0% of renter households.

Judgments average 1.8% of renter households a year, the share of filings that actually convert to an order. Against average income of $52,472, annual rent is only 16%, a wide affordability cushion.

Average gross rent runs $713, close to the Newton Falls average. 47% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Because the boundary contains one tract, 4.1/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
1 tracts · population-weighted
Rose Park vs Newton Falls How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
46.2% +58%
Newton Falls: 29.3%
Average gross rent
$713 -4%
Newton Falls: $745
Average HH income
$52,472 +1%
Newton Falls: $51,840
Poverty rate
13.0% -6%
Newton Falls: 13.9%
Renter share
46.7% -9%
Newton Falls: 51.3%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Rose Park and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 4.1–4.1

Why Rose Park scores 4.1

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 2.4–2.4 across tracts
2.4
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 4.5–4.5 across tracts
4.5
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 5.0–5.0 across tracts
5.0
Rent control risk
46% of income on rent · Range 6.3–6.3 across tracts
6.3
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 2.4–2.4 across tracts
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
47% renter households · Range 8.9–8.9 across tracts
8.9
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 6.4–6.4 across tracts
6.4
Economic stress
13.0% below poverty line · Range 3.2–3.2 across tracts
3.2
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 3.1–3.1 across tracts
3.1
Risk score comparison

Rose Park vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Rose Park score vs. parent city, state, U.S.4.1Rose ParkNeighborhood4.2Parent cityhost city4.0Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Rose Park

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
39155933600 4.1 4,705 46% $713
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 50

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 67%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 23%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 4%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 60%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history in Rose Park

Aggregated across 1 validated constituent tract. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households, pop-weighted.

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 29Total filings (sum)
  • 2.96%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.0%Peak year (2016)
  • 2.96%Latest filed (2016)
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Rose Park

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Rose Park

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Rose Park?

Rose Park scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Rose Park compare to Newton Falls overall?

Rose Park scores 0.1 points lower than Newton Falls overall (4.2/10). Renters spend 46% of income on rent vs 29% citywide. Average rent: $713 vs $745.
Q3

What is the average rent in Rose Park?

Average gross rent in Rose Park is $713/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Rose Park residents are renters?

47% of Rose Park households are renter-occupied (vs 51% in Newton Falls). The neighborhood has 4,705 residents.
Q5

Is Rose Park a high social-vulnerability area?

Rose Park sits in the 50th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (moderately vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Rose Park for landlords?

Rose Park carries a moderate-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (4.1/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Newton Falls as a whole (4.2/10), this neighborhood is in line with the citywide level.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Rose Park?

Rose Park has 4,622 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (93.1%), Black (non-Hispanic) (3.3%), Hispanic / Latino (2.2%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Rose Park

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further