Bixby Eviction Risk: Lower

The voucher gap is 50.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. 26% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Tulsa County average of 40.3%. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.4/10.

Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. At $1,771 a month, rents run 27% over what the rest of Bixby commands. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10.

It sits 0.7 points below the Tulsa County average of 3.7. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

At 12% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.9/10.

Poverty sits at 6%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Annual rent works out to 20% of average household income of $107,245.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.