Bixby Eviction Risk: Lower

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. The voucher gap is 29.8%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, supply constraint reads 8/10.

The severe-burden share is 9%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Against the Tulsa County average of 3.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points.

Average gross rent is $1,530, 10% above the Bixby average. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 13% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Annual rent works out to 18% of average household income of $99,360.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.